期刊文献+

多层螺旋CT颈动脉成像:不同注射流率与成像方法的相关研究 被引量:24

Multiple Detector-row Spiral CT Carotid Angiography: A Comparative Study of Different Injection Rate with Image Quality Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 通过比较 3种不同对比剂注射流率对多层螺旋CT颈动脉成像的影响以期获得合理扫描参数。资料与方法 随机选择无脑缺血症状和脑梗死患者及有症状者共 45例 ,随机分成 3ml/s、4ml/s、5ml/s 3组 ,对比剂用量根据扫描时间作相应的改变 ,其他扫描参数不变。采用最大密度和容积重建 2种后处理成像方法。根据 90条颈动脉血管边缘的清晰度、颈动脉的分级情况、颈动脉与其邻近软组织之间的密度差、颈静脉和甲状腺的密度综合评分 ,由 2位有经验的放射科医师用盲法评分 ,对比 3种不同注射流率对成像的影响 ,所有统计工作由SPSS软件完成。结果 与 3ml/s组相比 ,4ml/s组颈动脉强化峰值升高明显 ,使得颈动脉与邻近软组织间密度差异增大 ,3D图像信噪比提高 ,小血管显示的长度、血管边缘清晰度均有明显改善。 5ml/s与 4ml/s组之间的差异不明显。此外 ,5ml/s注射流率可带来扫描伪影。结论 随着注射流率的加快 ,颈动脉与邻近软组织密度差异变得愈明显 ,但注射流率超过 Objective To determine the optimal scanning parameters of multiple detector row spiral CT angiography (MDSCTA) for carotid artery by comparing the quality of the images obtained with three different injection rate of the contrast.Materials and Methods Forty five patients with or without clinical signs of cerebral ischemia or infarction were randomly selected and divided into three groups. During MDSCTA, the injection rate of 3ml/s, 4ml/s or 5ml/s was used for three groups, respectively. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) and volume rendering (VR) were used for image reconstruction. Based on the marginal sharpness and branches of the vessels, the density difference between the vessels and the adjacent tissues, and the density of the jugular veins and thyroid, a general evaluation of the image quality of the 90 carotid arteries was conducted by two experienced radiologists with blind method. A comparison of the image quality between three groups was made. Statistic analysis was carried out with the software of SPSS.Results For MIP, the image quality of 4ml/s group was superior to that of 3ml/s group, while no obvious difference existed between 4ml/s group and 5ml/s group. For VR, the difference in image quality between three groups was not significant.Conclusion For MDSCTA of carotid artery, the injection rate of 4ml/s is preferable. The injection rate over 4ml/s to further improve the image quality is of no clinical significance.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2002年第12期939-943,共5页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
基金 教育部博士点基金资助项目 (基金号 :974 1)
关键词 颈动脉 多层螺旋CT 注射流率 CT血管成像 Carotid artery Multiple detector row spiral CT Injection rate CT angiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[1]Hu H,He HD,Foley WD,et al.Four multidector-row spiral CT:Image quality and volume coverage speed.Radiology,2000,215:55 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Rubin GD,Shiau MC,Leung AN,et al.Aorta and iliac arteries: Single versus multiple detector-row spiral CT angiography.Radiology,2000,215:670 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Wise SW,Hopper KD,Have TT,et al.Measuring carotid artery stenosis using CT angiography: The dilemma of artifactual lumen eccentricity.AJR,1998,170:919 被引量:1
  • 4[4]Leclerc X,Godefroy O,Lucas C,et al.Internal carotid arterial stenosis: CT angiography with volume rendering.Radiology,1999,210:673 被引量:1
  • 5[5]Dillon EM,Van Leeuwen MS,Fernandez MA.CT angiography: Application to the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.Radiology,1993,189:211 被引量:1
  • 6[6]Schwartz RB,Jones KM,Chernoff DM.Common carotid artery bifurcation: Evaluation with spiral CT.Radiology,1992,185:513 被引量:1
  • 7[7]Rubin GD,Jeffrey RB.3D spiral CT angiography of the abdomen and thorax.In: Fishmen EK,Jeffrey RB,eds.spiral CT.New York;Raven,1995,183 被引量:1
  • 8[8]Verhoek G,Costello P,Khoo EW,et al.Carotid bifurcation CT angiography: Assessment of interactive volume rendering.J Comput Assist Tomogr,1999,23:590 被引量:1
  • 9[9]Provenzale JM,Beauchamp NJ Jr.Recent advances in imaging of cerebrovascular disease.Radiologic Clinics of North America Volume,1999,37: 467 被引量:1

同被引文献181

引证文献24

二级引证文献186

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部