摘要
二手车交易中,买卖双方常常会因里程数问题产生纠纷。里程表回调的情况下,买方的维权路径有多种选择,其中以重大误解作为请求权基础为较优选项。在构成要件方面,'重大误解'从概念上折射出的误区需要澄清,权利主体不应局限于误解人一方,实务中对'错误认识'范围与程度的思维定式亟需调整和匡正,表意人与误解人的主观心态对认定'重大误解'具有重要意义。在法律效果方面,《民法总则》'一刀切'取消了人民法院的变更权,此为一种遗憾。上述问题在二手车交易里程表回调纠纷中均有不同程度的呈现和意义,对此类纠纷中买方权益的保障颇具研究价值。
In second-hand car transactions,buyers and sellers often have disputes over mileage issues.In a case of changing mileage on an odometer,applying the system of gross misunderstanding as the basis of claim is a priority option among multiple paths to protect the buyer’s rights.In aspect of constitutive elements,it is necessary to clarify the misunderstanding reflected in the concept of'gross misunderstanding';the subjects of rights shall not be merely limited to the person misunderstands;it is necessary to adjust and correct the thinking formula of the scope and extent of'false understanding'in practice,and the subjective attitudes of both the person who expresses the idea and the person who misunderstands the idea conveyed is of great significance for identifying gross misunderstanding.In aspect of legal effects,it is a regret that the'General Provisions of the Civil Law'has abolished the alteration right of people’s courts in a one-size-fits-all manner.The above problems arise in the disputes over mileage change in second-hand car transaction with different degrees of significance and it is worthwhile to study the protection for buyer’s rights in such disputes.
作者
顾彬
Gu Bin(The People's Court of Chongchuan District,Nantong 226007,China)
出处
《贵州警官职业学院学报》
2019年第4期24-29,共6页
Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College
关键词
二手车交易
里程表回调
重大误解制度
变更权
second-hand car transaction
changing mileage on an odometer
gross misunderstanding system
alteration right
