摘要
目的比较颈前路减压椎间融合钛板内固定术(A组)与ZERO-P内固定术(B组)治疗单节段颈椎病的疗效。方法对自2011-06—2012-01行颈前路椎间融合术的单节段颈椎病34例进行回顾性分析。结果 27例获得随访17~25个月,平均21个月。A、B组术中出血量、术后影像学表现差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组手术时间、术前及术后的JOA和VAS评分的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 2种手术方法均能获得满意疗效,出血少,术野清晰,创伤小,并发症少,但是ZERO-P内固定术手术时间短、操作简便,更有优势。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of anterior cervical approach decompression, interbody fusion and plate fixation(group A) and ZERO-P implant(group B) for treatment of single-segment cervical spondylosis. Methods The clinical data of 34 patients with anterior interbody fusion from June 2011 to January 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Results Twenty seven patients were followed for 17-25 months, averaged 21 months. There was no statistical significance in terms of blood loss and postoperative radiological measurement between group A an B(P >0.05), while differences between the operation time, pre-and postoperrative JOA and VAS evaluation of group A and B had statistical significance(P <0.05).Conclusion Both surgical methods can obtain satisfactory clinical results, less blood loss, clear operative field, less invasive,less postoperative complications. Because of shorter operative time and more convenience the ZERO-P internal fixation surgery shows more advantage than the plate fixation.
出处
《中国骨与关节损伤杂志》
2014年第5期424-426,共3页
Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
关键词
颈椎病
椎间融合术
钛板
ZERO-P
单节段颈椎病
Cervical spondylosis
Interbody fusion
Titanium
ZERO-P
Single-segment cervical spondylosis
