摘要
阅读完《关于修正的功的互等定理的讨论》(以下简称《讨论》)之后,对《讨论》有下述两个主要判断:①《讨论》作者对Betti功的互等定理的命题的理解是不完整和不准确的;②《讨论》作者认为“修正的功的互等定理实际上是Betti功的互等定理另一种表现形式”这一判断是错误的.
After reading“discussion on the reciprocal theorem of corrected work”(the paper is called“Discussion”for short afterword),there are two main judgments about“Discussion”:1.The author’s understanding of the proposition of the reciprocal theorem of Betti’s work is incomplete and inaccurate;2.“Discussion”the author thinks that“the corrected reciprocal theorem of work is actually another manifestation of Betti’s reciprocal theorem”is wrong.
作者
付宝连
FU Baolian(College of Architectural Engineering and Mechanics,Yanshan University,Qinhuangdao,Hebei 066004,P.R.China)
出处
《应用数学和力学》
CSCD
北大核心
2024年第12期1589-1592,共4页
Applied Mathematics and Mechanics
关键词
Betti功的互等定理
修正的功的互等定理
倒易功
直梁系统
小变形
线弹性
Betti’s reciprocal theorem
corrected reciprocal theorem
reciprocal work
straight beam system
small deformation
liner elasticity
