摘要
公共企事业单位信息公开的立法目的并不明朗,多个规范之间出现了不同的目的表述。从信息公开制度的产生及功能来看,知情权保障应是其目的,但知情权作为一项抽象的权利,必须明确其权利属性与内涵,才能确定具体的制度构建路径。在公共企事业单位信息公开制度中,知情权具有双重权利属性。基于公共企事业单位在市场经济活动中产生的信息公开对应的是私法属性的消费者知情权,此类信息的公开不适用《政府信息公开条例》的规定,即应沿着“脱条例化”的路径公开;基于行政机关委托或规章的授权而行使公共事务管理权所产生的信息公开,对应的是公法属性的知政权,此类信息的公开应与政府信息公开一样,适用《政府信息公开条例》的规定,即沿着“入条例化”的路径公开。公共企事业单位在提供公共服务的过程中,如果能通过双层次判断标准的检验,即可被认定为具备行政机关特征或拥有公共事务管理权,其信息应按照“入条例化”的路径公开,否则便应按照“脱条例化”的路径公开。
The legislative purpose of information disclosure in public enterprises and institutions is obsure,and different purpose statements have emerged among multiple regulations.From the perspective of the emergence and function of the information disclosure system,the protection of the right to know should be the purpose.However,as an abstract right,the specific attributes and connotations of the right to know must be clarified in order to determine the construction path of information disclosure system.The right to know has a dual attribute in the information disclosure system of public enterprises and institutions.The information disclosure generated by public enterprises and institutions in market economy activities corresponds to the consumer's right to know with private law attributes.The disclosure of such information does not apply to the provisions of the Regulations on the Disclosure of Government Information,and should be disclosed along the path of“removing from the regulation”.The information disclosure arising from the exercise of public affairs management power based on administrative agency delegation or regulatory authorization corresponds to the public law attribute of the right to know about administration.The disclosure of such information should be subject to the provisions of the Regulations on the Disclosure of Government Information,just like the disclosure of government information,that is,it should be disclosed along the path of“getting into the regulation”.In the process of providing public services,public enterprises and institutions can be recognized as having administrative characteristics or public affairs management power if they can pass the double layered judgment criteria.Their information should be disclosed through the path of“getting into the regulation”,otherwise it should be disclosed through the path of“removing from the regulation”.
出处
《苏州大学学报（法学版）》
CSSCI
2024年第4期130-140,共11页
Journal of Soochow University：Law Edition
基金
江苏省社会科学基金青年项目“行政委托制度完善研究”(项目编号:24FXC008)
江苏高校哲学社会科学研究一般项目“高校信息公开法律制度研究”(项目编号:2022SJYB0357)的阶段性成果。
关键词
公共企事业单位
信息公开
知情权
双重路径
Public Enterprises and Institutions
Information Disclosure
Right to Know
Dual Path
