摘要
全民公益性作为中国国家公园体制建设的三大理念之一,相关研究以理论和定性分析为主,较少有实证研究和定量评价,为保护实践提供的科学依据有限。本研究基于“全民共有-全民共建-全民共享”三维框架,构建了国家公园全民公益性评价指标体系。基于利益相关者感知视角,通过问卷调查、线性判别分析、分层回归分析等方法,对大熊猫国家公园的全民公益性水平进行了定量评价。结果表明:(1)大熊猫国家公园的全民公益性评价较为积极,其感知程度由高到低为:全民共有>全民共享>全民共建;(2)各类利益相关者对全民公益性的评价存在显著差异,其中管理局和地方政府最为积极,当地社区最为消极,地方企业、专家学者和访客较为中立。研究指出,全民公益性的基层实践需要重点关注当地社区,全面推广社区共管,并完善生态补偿机制,以促进社区参与共建和利益共享。此外,应促进利益相关者的沟通交流、优化各类主体参与的方式和途径。研究旨在丰富全民公益性的理论内涵,提出定量测度全民公益性水平的有效方法,为优化国家公园公众参与机制提供科学依据。
Aims:Common welfare is one of the three foundational concepts in the establishment of Chinese national parks.Existing research predominantly focused on theoretical and qualitative analyses,with few empirical explorations and quantitative discussions,resulting in limited scientific guidance and support for the conservation practices.Therefore,this study aims to provide empirical evidence and scientific reference for achieving common welfare in Chinese national parks by proposing a comprehensive indicator framework.Methods:This study draws on three dimensions,owned by all,participated by all,and shared by all,and proposes 15 common welfare indicators.Using questionnaire surveys and methodologies such as linear discriminant analysis and hierarchical regression analysis,a quantitative assessment of common welfare was conducted based on the perceptions of stakeholders in the Giant Panda National Park(GPNP).Results:The results showed that the overall common welfare in the GPNP was generally perceived positively.However,perceptions varied among stakeholder groups:local management agencies and governments held the most positive views,local communities had the most negative perceptions,while local enterprises,experts,and visitors maintained a neutral stance.Conclusion:To achieve common welfare,increased attention should be directed toward the local communities.In particular,comprehensive promotion of community co-management and improvement of the ecological compensation mechanism are essential.Furthermore,enhancing communication among stakeholders and optimizing their participation are crucial steps in this process.
作者
张雨琦
文君
张引
李晟之
Yuqi Zhang;Jun Wen;Yin Zhang;Shengzhi Li(Faculty of Spatial Sciences,University of Groningen,Groningen 9700 AV,the Netherlands;Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment,Delft University of Technology,Delft 2628BL,the Netherlands;School of Architecture and Urban Planning,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400045,China;Research Center of Resources and Environment,Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences,Chengdu 610072,China)
出处
《生物多样性》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2024年第9期91-104,共14页
Biodiversity Science
基金
国家自然科学基金(52108040)
中央高校基本业务费项目(2024CDJXY014,2023CDJXY-008)
国家留学基金(202006260019,202006260017)。
