摘要
作为对基层政府组织及其工作的评价、监督和指导的一项制度安排,基层考核并非总是发挥“以考促治”的正向功能,在脱嵌互动中会耗损基层治理效能,具体表征为抑制或阻碍基层治理能力和效果的正常发挥。因此,以考核促进治理的研究解释受到现实的挑战,冲击了学界传统的考核正向功能认识观。基于“制度—场域”交互视角,结合J镇案例研究发现,基层考核耗损治理效能的成因归结为考核制度和治理场域二者间的脱嵌互动。具言之,在静态层面呈现为“制度层”的表层触发机制和“场域层”的深层驱动机制,在动态层面呈现为“制度—场域交互层”的交互过程转化机制,遵循“环境要素塑造—基础要素定型—中介要素传导—驱动要素生成”的链条理路。回归基层考核促进治理效能提升的价值旨归,需着力解决基层考核制度与治理场域二者动态匹配的张力问题,使基层考核在合理预期的轨道内运行。
As a systematic arrangement for the evaluation,supervision and guidance of grassroots cadres and their work,grassroots assessment does not play the role of promoting work and improving governance efficiency in practice,but consumes grassroots gov⁃ernance efficiency in practice,specifically characterized as blocking or restricting the effectiveness and ability of grassroots gover⁃nance.Therefore,the research and interpretation of promoting governance through assessment has been challenged by reality,effec⁃tively impacting the traditional positive functional understanding of assessment in the academic community.Based on the interac⁃tive perspective of "system-field "and combined with the case study of J town,it is found that the causes of the effectiveness ofgrassroots assessment and governance can be attributed to the surface triggering mechanism,deep driving mechanism,and internaltransformation process mechanism of the interaction between the system and field.The three run through the interactive influencedimensions of institutional practice,such as static and dynamic,subjective and objective,and internal and external.To achieve thevalue goal of promoting grassroots governance efficiency through grassroots assessment,it is necessary to focus on solving the ten⁃sion problem of dynamic matching between the "system" and "field" of grassroots assessment,so as to ensure that grassroots assess⁃ment operates within a reasonably expected track.
作者
陈廷栋
Chen Tingdong(School of International and Public Affairs,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200030)
出处
《甘肃行政学院学报》
CSSCI
2024年第5期49-60,M0004,M0005,共14页
Journal of Gansu Administration Institute
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“基于大型调查数据的城市复合风险分析及治理研究”(23&ZD144)
“国家资助博士后研究人员计划”资助(GZC20231565)。
关键词
基层治理
基层考核
制度—场域
治理效能
Grassroots governance
Grassroots appraise
System-field
Governance effectiveness
