摘要
[目的]通过系统收集、分析和评价中成药治疗糖尿病眼病的相关随机对照试验(RCT)文献,总结其临床应用价值,为今后开展RCT研究、指南及医保政策制定提供依据。[方法]基于中医药循证研究证据库系统(EVDS)下的中成药临床证据数据库(AICED-CPM)收录的文献,并补充检索其他8个数据库,检索时间为建库至2022年12月,依据制定的纳排标准筛选相关文献,对其发表年份、发文地区、疾病概况等方面进行整合分析与评价。[结果]纳入中成药治疗糖尿病眼病RCT 417篇,最早发表于1998年,2017年发表数量最多51篇(12.23%),发文量最多的地区是河南。以糖尿病性视网膜病变疾病RCT数量最多。干预/对照措施以中成药+西药vs.西药最多(122篇29.26%)。90.17%的文献报告了疗程,以61~90 d为主。结局指标方面以症状体征应用最多1011次(44.42%);经济学评估指标应用最少6次(0.26%)。方法学质量方面,仅有1.92%报告了分配隐藏;96.40%的研究受试者盲法被评为高风险。随机对照试验报告规范(CONSORT)声明分析中,417篇RCT仅有2个条目为完全报告,7个条目为未报告。[结论]治疗糖尿病眼病的中成药应用广泛,推动了中医药治疗眼病的新进展。结局指标选取不规范,指标名称繁多,不统一,难以提供临床价值,研究设计中存在不规范、规模小等问题。应加快开展具有中医特色的核心指标体系,进一步为临床研究提供科学严谨的试验数据,样本量、试验注册、知情同意等方法学质量均存在明显不足,应提高文献研究的真实性、科学性、规范性和外推性。
[Objective] Through systematically collecting,analyzing,and evaluating the relevant randomized controlled trial(RCT)literature on the treatment of diabetic eye disease with traditional Chinese medicine(TCM),this study summarizes its clinical application value and provides a basis for future RCT research,guidelines,and insurance policy formulation.[Methods] Based on the Traditional Chinese Medicine Evidence-based Research Evidence Database System(EVDS) under the AICED-CPM database of the Chinese Medicine Clinical Evidence Database(AICED),literature was collected from eight other databases,from the establishment of the database to December 2022,and relevant literature was selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.The publication year,region of issuance and disease profile were integrated and evaluated.[Results] A total of 417 RCTs on the treatment of diabetic eye disease with TCM were included,with the earliest publication in 1998 and the highest number of publications in 2017(51,12.23%).The region with the highest number of publications was Henan.The RCT,in most cases,was diabetic retinopathy.The intervention/control measures with the most cases were TCM combined with Western medicine vs.Western medicine(122,29.26%).The 90.17% of the literature reported the duration of treatment,with the majority being 61 to 90 days.The outcome indicator used most frequently was symptoms and signs(1 011 times,44.42%);the least commonly used was economic evaluation indicators(6 times,0.26%).In terms of methodological quality,only 1.92% reported allocation concealment;96.40% of the study subjects were at high risk of being blinded.In the CONSORT statement analysis of randomized controlled trials(RCTs) on the treatment of diabetic eye disease with Chinese herbal medicine,out of417 RCTs,only 2 had complete reporting,and 7 had no reporting.[Conclusion] Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of diabetic eye disease is widely used,driving new progress in the treatment of eye diseases with TCM.The selection of outcome
作者
张雅姿
季昭臣
宋雯婷
王玥彤
胡海殷
彭徳慧
王丹蕾
吴晓蕾
史梦龙
金鑫瑶
杨丰文
ZHANG Yazi;JI Zhaochen;SONG Wenting;WANG Yuetong;HU Haiyin;PENG Dehui;WANG Danlei;WU Xiaolei;SHI Menglong;JIN Xinyao;YANG Fengwen(Evidence-Based Medicine Center,Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin 301617,China;School of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin 301617,China;Hai-he Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine,Tianjin 301617,China)
出处
《天津中医药》
CAS
2024年第10期1285-1292,共8页
Tianjin Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金
中医药创新团队及人才支持计划国家中医药多学科交叉创新团队项目(ZYYCXTD-D-202204)
2022年度天津市教委科研计划项目(2022KJ153)
现代中医药海河实验室科技项目:中医药临床证据生产信息平台(22HHZYSS00013)。
关键词
糖尿病眼病
循证医学
中医
临床评价
RCT
文献分析
diabetic eye disease
evidence-based medicine
traditional Chinese medicine
clinical evaluation
RCT
literature analysis
