期刊文献+

认罪认罚被追诉人反悔权的保障——正向规范路径与反向排除模式

The Justification and Protection of the Right of Rescission of the Accused Person to Confess Crime and Punishment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 反悔权旨在为被追诉人提供一个依其单方意志消灭控辩合意法律效果的救济机会,其保护的事项范围包括实体性和程序性两重维度,上诉是其重要的行为方式。反悔权体现了“公正优先、凸显效率”的诉讼价值观,是保证认罪认罚理智性和自愿性的关键所在。未来应当从实体法、程序法和证据法三个角度建构反悔权的保障性规范;建构限制性规范时应当重点运用比例原则审查其合宪性,具体可以采用“反向排除模式”归纳带有权利滥用性质的上诉情形并以此作为反悔权滥用的认定标准,进而为这类上诉案件设置二审非全面审查的快速处理机制。 The right of rescission aims to provide the defendant with an opportunity to eliminate the legal effect of the agreement of prosecution and defense according to his unilateral will.The scope of its protection includes both substantive and procedural dimensions,and appeal is an important way of its behavior.The right of rescission has a deep constitutional foundation,embodies the litigation values of“justice first,highlighting efficiency”,and is the key to ensure the rational and voluntary punishment of guilty plea.In the future,we should construct the guarantee standard of rescission from three angles:substantive law,procedural law and evidence law.In the construction of restrictive norms,we should focus on applying the principle of proportionality to examine its constitutionality.Specifically,we can use the“reverse exclusion mode”to summarize the appeals with the nature of right abuse and take it as the identification standard of the abuse of the right of rescission,so as to set up a quick processing mechanism for the second instance of such appeals without comprehensive review.
作者 郭运帷 GUO Yunwei(Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China)
机构地区 吉林大学
出处 《北京警察学院学报》 2024年第4期34-41,共8页 Journal of Beijing Police College
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国特色刑事证据理论体系研究”(项目编号:18ZDA139)。
关键词 反悔权 认罪认罚从宽制度 上诉权 自愿性 right of rescission the system of pleading guilty and accepting punishment right of appeal voluntariness
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部