摘要
[目的/意义]开放科学强调科研成果的社会影响力,学术图书作为哲学社会科学研究成果的重要表现形式,有必要对其社会影响力进行评价研究。[方法/过程]结合已有研究和开放科学环境下学术图书在线交流特点,基于国内网络媒体平台挖掘Altmetrics指标,探索建立一套评价哲学社会科学学术图书社会影响力的指标体系,并以14—16届江苏省哲学社会科学优秀成果奖获奖图书为研究样本,采用主成分分析法进行赋权分析。[结果/结论]哲学社会科学学术图书Altmetrics指标数据相差较大,不同平台指标之间相关性偏低;高质量学术图书的社会影响力存在较大差距;不同评价维度下,哲学社会科学学术图书的影响力存在明显差别。作者需增强开放科学理念,重视并主动通过多种网络平台宣传学术图书;推动建立社会影响力数据集成平台,保障数据有效性和稳定性;加强图书社会影响力的评价,更全面评价哲社学术图书影响力;建议出台相关政策,激励学术图书社会影响力的提升。
[Purpose/Significance]Open science emphasizes the social influence of scientific research achievements.As an important manifestation of scientific research achievements in philosophy and social sciences,it is necessary to evaluate and study the social influence of academic books in the discipline.[Method/Process]Combined with existing research and the characteristics of online communication of academic books in an open science environment,Altmetrics index was mined based on domestic network media platforms to explore and establish a set of index system for evaluating the social influence of academic books in philosophy and social sciences.The award-winning books of the 14-16th Jiangsu Philosophy and Social Sciences Outstanding Achievement Award were taken as research samples.The principal component analysis method was used for weight analysis.[Result/Conclusion]The Altmetrics index data for philosophy and social sciences academic books are quite different,and the correlation between the indexes of different platforms is low.A big gap exists in the social influence of high-quality academic books.Under different evaluation dimensions,there are obvious differences in the influence of academic books in philosophy and social sciences.Authors should strengthen the understanding of open science,actively promote their academic books through various network platforms.The establishment of social influence data integration platform is important to ensure the effectiveness and stability of data.It should strengthen the evaluation of social influence of books,and more comprehensively evaluate the influence of academic books.The relevant policies can encourage the promotion of social influence of academic books.
作者
金洁琴
张欣欣
Jin Jieqin;Zhang Xinxin(Nanjing Tech University Library,Nanjing 210009;School of Economics and Management,Nanjing Tech University,Nanjing 211816)
出处
《图书情报工作》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第16期62-74,共13页
Library and Information Service
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“基于Altmetrics的人文社会科学学者的社会影响力评价研究”(项目编号:19YJC870011)研究成果之一。
