摘要
我国《个人信息保护法》要求个人信息处理具有合理的目的,此一规定在各国或地区立法中走在前列。然而,在司法实践中如何判断个人信息处理目的的合理性存在诸多难题。从灵活应对社会文化的变化出发,动态体系论的规范体系值得尝试。个人信息处理目的的合理性作为一般条款,其暗含着人格尊严原理、促进利用原理和社会价值原理等三项原理。在体系构造上,应以诸项原理为基础,借鉴既有学说和司法实践中的判断重点,运用公共利益、个人同意、时间推移与经济效率等重要性依次递减的四项因素构建动态体系。在具体解释与适用上,应重视四项因素的协动作用,以各项因素的基础评价为基准,灵活、弹性地判断个人信息处理目的的合理性,实现法效果的妥当性。
The Personal Information Protection Law requires that personal information processing has a legitimate purpose,which is at the forefront in the legislation of various countries or regions.However,it is difficult to judge the legitimacy of the purpose in judicial practice.From the perspective of flexibly coping with social and cultural changes,the flexible system is worth trying.The structure of the system should be based on the inherent principles of human dignity,promoting utilization and social value.From the existing theories and judgments in judicial practice,it should focus on the four factors whose importance decreases in turn,such as public interest,personal consent,time passage and economic efficiency,to build a flexible system.In application,the four factors should be combined and the basic evaluation of each factor should be taken as the benchmark to flexibly judge the legitimacy of the purpose.
出处
《法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第8期117-131,共15页
Law Science
基金
浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题“大数据时代被遗忘权本土化规则研究”(项目编号:20NDQN270YB)
司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目(项目编号:21SFB3018)的研究成果。
关键词
个人信息处理
目的限制原则
目的合理
动态体系论
processing purpose of personal data
purpose limitation
legitimate purpose
the flexible system theory
