摘要
胡塞尔在《几何学的起源》中区分了原初的明见性和公理的明见性,前者是现象学所要求的明见性,后者是近代哲学为理想化知识奠基的立足点。康德在公理的明见性的指引下通过主体的先天能力为知识奠基,表明其处于近代哲学的基本立场中,无法将知识何以可能的先天条件还原到其真正的先天基础上。胡塞尔通过回溯法返问理想化知识的先行基础,并且还原到前知识的生活世界领域。但是,原初明见的生活世界领域还不足以成为理想化知识的先天条件,因为它不仅须从理想化的现成领域中返回,而且还与康德意义上的主体的先天能力一样诉诸于静态的结构性描述。只有本质上贯穿原初领域与现成领域的内在历史性,才能从动态的发生意义上成为一切理想化知识何以可能的先天条件。
In The Origin of Geometry,Husserl makes a distinction between original and axiomatic evidence.The former is the evidence demanded by phenomenology,while the latter is the ground on which modern philosophy lays the foundation for idealized knowledge.Kant's grounding of knowledge through a priori empowerment of the subject,guided by axiomatic evidence,shows that he is in the basic position of modern philosophy,unable to reduce a priori conditions of what makes knowledge possible to its true priori foundation.Husserl returns to a prior foundation of idealized knowledge by means of retrospection and reduces it to the life-world realm of preknowledge.However,the life-world sphere of original evidence is not enough to be a prior condition of idealized knowledge,for it must not only return from the ready-made sphere of idealization,but also resorts to a static structural description in the same way as a prior empowerment of the subject in the Kantian sense.Only the internal historicity that essentially runs through the realm of the original and the realm of the ready-made can be a prior condition of how all idealized knowledge is possible in the sense of a dynamic genesis.
作者
范正兴
FAN Zhengxing(School of Philosophy,Anhui University,Anhui,Hefei 230000,China)
出处
《宜宾学院学报》
2024年第7期67-75,共9页
Journal of Yibin University
关键词
胡塞尔
康德
理想化
知识
内在历史性
Husserl
Kant
idealization
knowledge
internal historicity
