摘要
1965年郭沫若发文称《兰亭序》非王羲之手迹,高二适与严北溟著文反对。双方之根本分歧在于,高、严二先生未能遵循辩证唯物主义,尊重客观事物并力求找出事物发展的客观规律。从字体来看,《兰亭序》属于稿、行之间的新体——行书,而王羲之属于守成派,故写不出新体的《兰亭序》。另外,从南北书派的异同角度考察,王羲之生活的东晋以及其后的南北朝前期的书法,尚未出现南北的不同书派;而今本《兰亭序》与北朝碑志之间存在南帖北碑的差异。可见,郭老认为《兰亭序》非王羲之手迹是有道理的。
In 1965 Guo Moruo claimed in an article that Lantingxu was not written by Wang Xizhi,while Gao Ershi and Yan Beiming did not agree with Mr.Guo.The essential divergence among them was that Mr.Gao and Mr.Yan could not adhere to the dialect materialism and make much of objective things,so they couldn’t find out objective laws at last.According to the style of calligraphy,Lantingxu was the new style—Xingshu scripts,while Wang Xizhi belonged to the conservatives.Therefore,it was impossible for Wang Xizhi to write new style Lantingxu.There were not new calligraphy schools in the time of the Eastern Jin Dynasty and early periods of the Southern and Northern dynasties,but the extant Lantingxu was different from copybooks of the South Dynasties and inscriptions of the Northern dynasties.Thus it is reasonable that Lantingxu was not written by Wang Xizhi.
作者
黄永年
HUANG Yong-nian(School of History and Civilization,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi’an 710119,Shaanxi)
出处
《陕西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第4期15-24,共10页
Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
《兰亭序》真伪
王羲之
郭沫若
南帖北碑
the authenticity of Lantingxu
Wang Xizhi
Guo Moruo
copybooks of the Southern dynasties and inscriptions of the Northern dynasties
