摘要
在清代,例的法律效力仅次于律典,针对性非常强,对律典可起到补充和辅助的作用。嘉庆十二年,清廷在查办休宁县程元通遣属程怡仁赴京呈控棚民盗租山场案的基础上,专门针对徽州棚民问题议定章程,并奏准定例,附入《大清律例》。然而,通过考察嘉庆十七年休宁县再次发生的一起土棚之讼以及棚民问题实况即知,该定例在徽州地方上的实施并不理想,定例规定与地方实践严重背离,几成具文,土棚之间的矛盾一直难以得到根本解决。徽州棚民定例在地方上实施的受制因素很多,牵涉到土著、棚民与国家之间错综复杂的关系。
The legal effect of regulation was second only to the legal code in the Qing Dynasty,which was very targeted,and could play a supplementary and auxiliary role to the legal code.In the 12th year of Jiaqing,the Qing Dynasty agreed on the articles of association for the shed people in Huizhou,formulated regulation,and attached them to the Laws of the Qing Dynasty.However,through the study of a lawsuit between aborigine and shed people in Xiuning County in the 17th year of Jiaqing and the actual situation of the problem of shed people in Huizhou,it is known that the implementation of the regulation in Huizhou is not ideal,and the contradiction between aborigine and shed people in Huizhou has been difficult to be fundamentally solved.There are many restrictive factors in the local implementation of Huizhou shed people regulation,involving complex relations.
作者
郑小春
李明啸
ZHENG Xiaochun;LI Mingxiao(School of History,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu 241000,China)
出处
《安徽史学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第4期128-136,共9页
Historical Research In Anhui
基金
国家社科基金项目“明清徽州民间纠纷文书整理与研究”(21BZS069)的阶段性成果。
关键词
清代
徽州
土著
棚民
定例
Qing Dynasty
Huizhou
aborigine
shed people
regulation
