摘要
村上春树在《1Q84》BOOK2和BOOK3中塑造了牛河的不同形象。借助对牛河的不同塑造,村上以物语的方式来置换和暗示日本社会在“奥姆真理教”和“地铁沙林事件”上存在的误区:将奥姆信徒无限“妖魔化”,将善恶绝对化。村上暗示:这些误区本质上正是日本责任回避型的封闭性社会“体制”使然。村上呼吁“奥姆真理教”和“地铁沙林事件”的关键在于对日本社会体制的彻底反思,否则“地铁沙林事件”“福岛核事故”等悲剧会反复上演。值得注意的是,由于《1Q84》中过分强调体制之恶,致使牛河及领袖等人物身上弥漫着一股受害者气息,这不仅模糊了善恶的界限,更是对个体之恶的回避,甚至放纵。
Haruki Murakami has created different images of Ushikawa in 1Q84 BOOK2 and BOOK3.By characterizing Ushikawa differently in his fictional world,Murakami presents and implies the misunderstandings of Japanese society in the“Aum Shinrikyo”and the“Subway Sarin incident”:the infinite“demonization”of Aum followers and the absolutization of good and evil.These mistakes,Murakami suggests,are essentially the result of the Japanese social system rooted in a responsibility-shy and closed society.The key to“Aum Shinrikyo”and the“Subway Sarin incident”,according to Murakami,lies in a thorough reflection on the Japanese social system,otherwise tragedies such as the“subway Sarin incident”and the“Fukushima nuclear accident”will be repeated.It is worth noting that in 1Q84 the excessive emphasis on the evil sides of the system weakens the malevolent nature of characters such as Ushikawa and the leader,which not only blurs the boundary between good and evil,but also evades and even indulges the evil of the individual.
作者
王德峰
WANG De-feng(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Lanzhou University of Arts and Science,Lanzhou 730000,China)
出处
《兰州文理学院学报（社会科学版）》
2024年第4期20-25,共6页
Journal of Lanzhou University of Arts and Science(Social Science Edition)
基金
甘肃省2023年度软科学项目“共生理论视角下兰西城市群一体化文化机制体制创新研究”(23JRZA480)。
