摘要
宅基地使用权依托农房转让的制度沿革经历了从允许到限制的转变,体现了政府政策的强制驱动和利益诱导的结合。宅基地使用权依托农房转让的司法裁判具有明显的被动性,农户在集体经济组织外部转让农房时,法院一般会认定该转让合同无效,但司法政策又为宅基地改革预留了政策空间,体现了原则性与灵活性的统一。在宅基地使用权依托农房转让的实践创新中,国家并没有直接废除宅基地使用权依托农房限制转让的既有路径,径行允许转让,而是秉持审慎原则,独辟蹊径。试点地区宅基地使用权依托农房转让下受让人范围拓展,与集体经营性建设用地入市衔接,与宅基地资格权退出耦合及与宅基地入股、合作打通,均体现了对宅基地使用权权能受限的克服。
The system of the right to the use of the homestead with rural houses transfer has experienced an evolution from permission to restriction,which reflects the combination of government policy compulsion and interest orientation.Its judicial judgment is obviously passive.When farmers transfer their rural houses to non-members of the collective economic organization,the court will generally decide that the transfer contract is invalid.However,the judicial policy has leaved room for homestead reform,reflecting a balance between principle and flexibility.In this practical innovation,the country did not directly abolish the existing rules of restricting the right to the use of the homestead with rural houses transfer.Instead,being prudent,it opened up a new path.In the pilot area,its scope of transferees is expanded,it is integrated with the market entry of the collectively owned land parcels,and is combined with the withdrawal of the qualification right of the homestead,as well as the investment and cooperation of rural homestead,all reflecting the efforts to overcome the limitations of the right to the use of the homestead.
作者
韩宁
HAN Ning(School of Literature and Law,Henan Agricultural University,Zhengzhou 450046,Henan)
出处
《河北农业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2024年第3期67-77,共11页
Journal of Hebei Agricultural University (SOCIAL SCIENCES)
基金
国家社科基金重大项目:“新时代中国特色土地管理法律制度完善研究”(编号:18ZDA152)
河南省高校中华优秀传统文化传承发展专项课题:“中华优秀传统法治文化融入乡村社会治理现代化进程研究”(编号:2023-WHZX-05)。
关键词
宅基地使用权
农房
房地一体
三权分置
the right to the use of the homestead
rural houses
the integration of premises and land
separation of three rights
