摘要
国际法院在“尼加拉瓜诉哥伦比亚案”2022年判决中认定了毗连区制度及1982年《联合国海洋法公约》第33条的习惯国际法地位,指出依据当今的习惯国际法沿海国在其毗连区的权力限于海关、财政、移民、卫生四项并否定被告哥伦比亚在国内法中规定其于毗连区内有关安全等方面管制权的合法性。1992年《中华人民共和国领海及毗连区法》中也将“安全事项”写入毗连区管制权的范围内。面对国际法院的裁定,应谨慎审视法院论证的充分性与说服力并结合我国相关立法的时代背景和当前局势思考我国相关立法。
In its 2022 judgment on the merits in Alleged Violations of Sovereign Rights and Maritime Spaces in the Caribbean Sea(Nicaragua v.Colombia),the International Court of Justice(ICJ)affirmed the customary international law status of the regime of contiguous zones and Article 33 of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea(UNCLOS).The ICJ emphasized that under present-day customary international law,the powers of coastal States in the contiguous zone are limited to customs,fiscal,immigration,and sanitation.It rejected Colombia‘s assertion of control over security and other aspects of the contiguous zone as provided for in its domestic law.The 1992 Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone also includes“security matters”within the scope of control in the contiguous zone.Given the ICJ’s ruling,it is essential for us to carefully evaluate the adequacy and persuasiveness of the Court‘s arguments and take into account the historical context of relevant legislation and the current situation in China when considering our legislation.
作者
融雪
RONG Xue(School of Law,Xiamen University)
出处
《中华海洋法学评论》
2023年第4期167-199,共33页
China Oceans Law Review
