期刊文献+

冠心病合并慢性肾病经皮冠状动脉介入术后替格瑞洛应用的系统性评价

Systematic evaluation of the use of tegretol after PCI for coronary artery disease combined with chronic kidney disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的系统评价冠心病合并慢性肾病经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)后患者使用替格瑞洛的有效性和安全性。方法计算机检索中国知网、万方、维普、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library数据库。根据Cochrane系统评价手册和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)对纳入研究的质量进行评价。采用Stata 15.0软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入了10项研究,涉及4项随机对照试验和6项队列研究,合计8110例冠心病合并慢性肾病PCI术后患者,试验组3356例,对照组4754例。Meta分析结果显示:在有效性方面,两组患者不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)(OR=0.78,95%CI:0.68~0.89,P<0.001)、心肌梗死发生率(OR=0.76,95%CI:0.62~0.93,P<0.001)比较,差异均有统计学意义;两组患者全因死亡(OR=0.81,95%CI:0.59~1.10,P=0.179)、心源性死亡(OR=0.76,95%CI:0.54~1.05,P=0.542)、卒中(OR=0.87,95%CI:0.65~1.17,P=0.354)、重复血运重建发生率(OR=0.73,95%CI:0.51~1.04,P=0.077)比较,差异无统计学意义。在安全性方面,两组患者出血发生率(OR=1.12,95%CI:0.85~1.46,P=0.432)比较,差异无统计学意义。结论应用替格瑞洛治疗冠心病合并慢性肾病PCI术后患者,全因死亡、心源性死亡、卒中、重复血运重建发生率与对照组相比疗效相当,但是替格瑞洛可有效降低MACCE、心肌梗死的发生率,且不增加出血风险。 Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of ticagrelor in patients with coronary artery disease combined with chronic kidney disease after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).Methods Computerized searches were performed on China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),Wan Fang Data Knowledge Service Platform(WanFang),Vip Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database(VIP),PubMed,Web of Science,Embase,and Cochrane Library databases.The quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Evaluation and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale(NOS)scale.Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.0.Results A total of 10 studies,involving 4 randomized controlled trials(RCTs)and 6 cohort studies,were included,enrolling a total of 8110 post-PCI patients with coronary artery disease combined with chronic kidney disease.There were 3356 patients in the trial group and 4754 patients in the control group.Metaanalysis results showed that,in terms of effectiveness,the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events(MACCE)(OR=0.78,95%CI:0.68-0.89,P<0.001),and that of myocardial infarction(OR=0.76,95%CI:0.62-0.93,P<0.001)in the patients were statistically different between the two groups.Comparing the incidence of all-cause death(OR=0.81,95%CI:0.59-1.10,P=0.179),cardiac death(OR=0.76,95%CI:0.54-1.05,P=0.542),stroke(OR=0.87,95%CI:0.65-1.17,P=0.354),and repetitive revascularization(OR=0.73,95%CI:0.51-1.04,P=0.077)between the two groups,the difference was not statistically significant.In terms of safety,there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of bleeding(OR=1.12,95%CI:0.85-1.46,P=0.432)between the two groups.Conclusion The treatment of post-PCI patients with coronary artery disease combined with chronic kidney disease by using ticagrelor is effective in reducing the incidence of MACCE and myocardial infarction without increasing the risk of bleeding.Meanwhile,the incidence of all-cause mortality,cardiac death,stroke,and
作者 尹秀平 徐杨 王义国 高艳 刘新新 侯新 张启明 Yin Xiu-ping;Xu Yang;Wang Yi-guo;Gao Yan;Liu Xin-xin;Hou Xin;Zhang Qi-ming(Experimental Research Center,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100700,China;Chinese Medicine Outpatient Clinic,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100700,China;Center for Evidence-Based Medicine,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100105,China;Department of Pharmacy,Guang’anmen Hospital,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100053,China)
出处 《中国药物应用与监测》 CAS 2024年第2期130-135,共6页 Chinese Journal of Drug Application and Monitoring
基金 中国中医科学院医学实验中心揭榜挂帅项目(JBGS2021009) 中国中医科学院科技创新工程课题(CI2021A05407) 国家科学技术部重点研发计划项目(2019YFC1711700) 首都卫生发展科研专项(首发2024-4-4381)。
关键词 慢性肾病 冠心病 替格瑞洛 经皮冠状动脉介入术 系统评价 Chronic kidney disease Coronary artery disease Ticagrelor Percutaneous coronary intervention Systematic evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献71

  • 1李馨妍,王耿,方针,谢海方,李根.血管内超声检查指导下行冠状动脉旋磨术及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗重度冠状动脉钙化冠心病患者有效性及安全性研究[J].临床军医杂志,2022,50(5):470-472. 被引量:15
  • 2Moher D,Liberati A,Tetzlaff J. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses:the PRISMA statement[J].Annals of Internal Medicine,2009.264-269. 被引量:1
  • 3Moher D,Cook D J,Eastwood S. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials:the QUOROM statement[J].The Lancet,1999.1896-1900. 被引量:1
  • 4Group M. Meta-Analysis of Observational studies in Epidemiology.A proposal for reporting[J].Journal of the American Medical Association,2000.2008-2012. 被引量:1
  • 5Sacks HS,Berrier J,Reitman D. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials[J].New England Journal of Medicine,1987.450-455. 被引量:1
  • 6Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses[J].European Journal of Epidemiology,2010.603-605. 被引量:1
  • 7Slim K,Nini E,Forestier D. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors):development and validation of a new instrument[J].Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery,2003.712-716. 被引量:1
  • 8Jadad AR,Moore RA,Carroll D. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials:is blinding necessary[J].Controlled Clinical Trials,1996.1-12. 被引量:1
  • 9Higgins J,Green S. Cochrane Collaboration:Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0[updated March 2011][M].John Wiley \& Sons Ltd and The Cochrane Collaboration,Chichester,2011. 被引量:1
  • 10Higgins JP,Altman DG,Gotzsche PC. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials[J].British Medical Journal,2011.d5928. 被引量:1

共引文献330

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部