摘要
当前,开设赌场罪构成要件中,对于开设实体赌场的认定有司法适用扩张之嫌,应当予以理论限缩。在主观目的上,司法机关倾向于将“明知”开设供他人赌博的场所等同为开设赌场,应限缩“明确知道”的适用范围;在客观开设赌场行为上,赌场的语义射程边界呈不当的扩张趋势,应将刑法上的“赌场”含义与行政法上的“为赌博提供场所”进行区分,对赌场的综合认定不要求以营利为目的;在违法所得的认定上,应不包括正常收取的场所和服务费用,将“抽头渔利”作为违法所得认定的关键因素。
Among the current constitutive elements of the crime of opening a casino,the opening of physical casinos is suspected of expanding judicial application and should be theoretically limited.For subjective purposes,the judicial authorities tend to equate knowingly well opening a place for others to gamble with opening a casino,so the scope of application of“knowing well”should be narrowed;in terms of the objective behavior of opening a casino,the semantic range boundaries of casinos show an inappropriate expansion trend,so the meaning of“casino”in criminal law should be distinguished from providing places for gambling in administrative law,and the comprehensive identification of casinos does not require profit-making;in the identification of illegal income,the expenses normally charged for venues and services should not be included,but the profits taken from gambling should be a key factor in determining illegal income.
作者
邓义伟
Deng Yiwei(Nanchang University,Nanchang Jiangxi 330031,China)
出处
《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》
2024年第2期89-98,共10页
Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
关键词
开设赌场罪
限缩解释
主观明知
赌场认定
违法所得
crime of opening a casino
explanation of limitation
subjective knowing well
identification of casino
illegal income
