摘要
背景:目前国内外对关节镜下喙突无隧道悬吊固定与喙突单隧道固定治疗肩锁关节脱位的术后疗效研究报道较少,两种术式的具体临床疗效及是否存在其他风险有待探索。目的:比较关节镜下使用TightRope带袢带钢板喙突单隧道固定与喙突无隧道悬吊固定治疗急性Ⅲ-Ⅴ型肩锁关节脱位的短期临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2019年6月至2022年9月新疆医科大学第六附属医院收治符合纳入标准的45例肩锁关节脱位患者,根据手术治疗方案分为2组,喙突单隧道组20例行肩关节镜下喙突单隧道固定,喙突无隧道组25例行肩关节镜下喙突无隧道悬吊固定。比较两组手术时间、切口长度及围术期失血量;对比两组术前、术后3个月及末次随访时肩关节Constant-Murley评分、目测类比评分、美国肘肩关节外科医师协会评分及术中、术后并发症等评价指标。结果与结论:①所有患者均顺利完成手术,术中无重要神经、血管损伤,喙突无隧道组手术时间较喙突单隧道组更短,差异有显著性意义(P<0.05),两组术中出血量、切口长度无显著差异(P>0.05);②所有患者随访12-24个月,平均随访(15.29±2.73)个月;③喙突单隧道组内比较:在术后3个月及末次随访时,目测类比评分较术前显著降低(P<0.05);Constant-Murley评分、美国肘肩关节外科医师协会评分较术前显著增加(P<0.05);喙突无隧道组内比较:在术后3个月及末次随访时,目测类比评分较术前显著降低(P<0.05);Constant-Murley评分、美国肘肩关节外科医师协会评分较术前显著增加(P<0.05);两组比较:在术后3个月随访时,喙突无隧道组Constant-Murley评分高于喙突单隧道组(P<0.05);两组间目测类比评分、美国肘肩关节外科医师协会评分相比差异无显著性意义(P>0.05);在术前及末次随访时,两组各评分在对应时间点之间比较差异均无显著性意义(P>0.05);④术中、术后并发症:喙突单隧
BACKGROUND:At present,there are few reports on the postoperative efficacy of arthroscopic coracoid tunnel-free suspension fixation and coracoid single tunnel fixation in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation at home and abroad.The specific clinical efficacy of the two procedures and whether there are other risks need to be explored.OBJECTIVE:To compare the short-term postoperative clinical efficacy of arthroscopic TightRope band plate fixation with single tunnel fixation of the coracoid process and tunnel-free suspension fixation of the coracoid process in the treatment of acute type III-V acromioclavicular joint dislocation.METHODS:A retrospective analysis was performed in 45 patients with acromioclavicular joint dislocation who met the inclusion criteria admitted to the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from June 2019 to September 2022,and were divided into coracoid single tunnel fixation group(20 cases)and coracoid tunnel-free suspension fixation group(25 cases)according to the surgical treatment plan.Operation time,incision length,blood loss,Constant-Murley score,visual analogue scale score,the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons(ASES)score and intraoperative and postoperative complications of the shoulder joint before operation,3 months after surgery and the last follow-up were compared between the two groups.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:All patients successfully completed the operation,and there was no important nerve or blood vessel damage during the operation.The operation time of the coracoid tunnel-free suspension fixation group was significantly shorter than that of the coracoid tunnel-free suspension fixation group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss and incision length between the two groups(P>0.05).All patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months,with an average of(15.29±2.73)months.In the coracoid single tunnel fixation group,at 3 months after operation and the final follow-up,the visual analogue scale score was significantly l
作者
曾勇涛
郑宏程
那次克道尔吉
热发提·尼加提
舒莉
刘旭
陈洪涛
Zeng Yongtao;Zheng Hongcheng;Nacikedaoerji;Refati·Nijiati;Shu Li;Liu Xu;Chen Hongtao(Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830054,Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,China;The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830002,Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,China)
出处
《中国组织工程研究》
CAS
北大核心
2025年第5期1036-1042,共7页
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
关键词
肩锁关节脱位
肩关节镜
喙锁韧带
喙突单隧道固定
喙突无髓道悬吊固定
acromioclavicular dislocation
shoulder arthroscopy
coracoclavicular ligament
single tunnel fixation
coracoid tunnel-free suspension fixation
