摘要
刑民交叉案件立法空白为刑事处罚干扰经济纠纷打开方便之门,成为保护民营企业家、护航民营经济的痛处。民法与刑法价值功能不同,刑民交叉案件处置不当,不仅不会实现责任制度的应有价值,反而会导致民、刑两种责任相抵牾。法条竞合使同一行为有刑、民两种不同的法律评价,责任追究上的冲突给司法实践带来诸多困难。从实体法上看,法律适用的冲突最终表现为利益的冲突。民刑交叉案件审理应以实体正义为目标,以利益衡量为手段,以人民期待为检验标尺。在程序选择上,“先刑后民”的价值判断明显不符合市场经济发展趋势,严重制约民营经济发展;“先民后刑”的程序机制在审理涉众型经济犯罪时化解矛盾效果明显不佳。本文针对刑民交叉案件,提出“刑民一体”的程序机制,在保证刑民交叉案件司法公正、提高司法审判效率的同时为各个主体利益的实现保驾护航。
The legislative gap of criminal-civil overlapping cases leaves loopholes for criminal punishment to interfere with economic disputes,and becomes the Achilles heel of protecting private entrepreneurs and escorting private economy.Civil law and criminal laws have different value functions.Improper handling of criminal-civil overlapping cases will not only fail to realize the due value of liability system,but also lead to the contradiction between civil and criminal liability.The concurrence of laws and articles makes the same act have two different legal evaluations:criminal and civil,and the conflict in accountability brings many difficulties to judicial practice.From the perspective of substantive law,the conflict of law application is ultimately manifested as the conflict of interests.The trial of such over lapping case should take substantive justice as the goal,interest measurement as the means,and people’s expectation as the test yardstick.In the selection of procedures,the value judgment of“Criminal before Civil”is obviously inconsistent with the development trend of market economy,which seriously restricts the development of private economy.The procedural mechanism of“Civil before Criminal”is obviously ineffective in resolving contradictions in the trial of stakeholder economic crimes.This paper puts forward the procedural mechanism of“Integration of Criminal and Civil”for criminal and civil cross cases,which guarantees the judicial justice of criminal and civil cross cases,improves the efficiency of judicial trial,and protects the rights and interests of all stakeholders to the maximum extent.
作者
郭艳梅
GUO Yanmei(Jilin Police College,Changchun 130117,China)
出处
《长春师范大学学报》
2024年第5期46-53,共8页
Journal of Changchun Normal University
关键词
刑民交叉
制度利益
利益衡量
人民至上
刑民一体
overlapping of criminal and civilian
institutional interest
benefit measurement
People First
integration of criminal and civil
