摘要
《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中是否存在“循环论证”的问题是学术界长期争论的焦点。实际上,“循环论证”是对马克思的一种误读。在《1844年经济学哲学手稿》第一手稿中,马克思从批判国民经济学出发,用国民经济学的语言和规律阐释问题。准确把握异化、外化和私有财产三个概念及其相互关系是破解“循环论证”的关键。外化劳动是私有财产的根源,外化劳动产生了基于自身劳动基础上的私有财产,而私有财产权的社会分化使得私有财产具有资本属性,进而产生异化劳动。马克思在《1844年经济学哲学手稿》第一手稿中提出要研究异化劳动的起源和私有财产的本质,这对于人们理解劳动从个体向社会的转变具有重要意义,而这一问题的提出本身就打破了“循环论证”。
The issue of whether there is a"circular argument"in Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 has been a long-standing debate in the academic community.In fact,"circular argument"is a misreading of Marx.In the first draft of Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844,Marx,starting from criticizing national economics,used the lan-guage and laws of national economics to explain issues.Accurately grasping the three key concepts of alienation,externali-zation,and private property and their interrelationships is the key to cracking the"circular argument".Externalized labor is the root of private property,and it generates private property based on its own labor foundation.However,due to the so-cial differentiation of private property rights,private property has the attribute of capital,which in turn leads to alienated la-bor.In the first draft of Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844,Marx proposed to study the origin of alienated labor and the essence of private property,which is crucial for understanding the transformation of labor from individuals to socie-ty.The proposal of this issue itself breaks the"circular argument".
作者
刘玉芝
吴宏伟
LIU Yuzhi;WU Hongwei(College of Politics and Public Administration,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300380,China)
出处
《山西高等学校社会科学学报》
2024年第5期45-51,共7页
Social Sciences Journal of Universities in Shanxi
基金
天津市哲学社会科学规划项目“建设社会主义制度文化:把握意识形态领导权”(TJBXGJ19-001)。
关键词
异化劳动
外化劳动
私有财产
“循环论证”
alienated labor
externalized labor
private property
"circular argument"
