摘要
政府自动化决策是一种由人工智能参与,部分或者完全取代行政主体参与,实现行政行为过程的自动化、无人化甚至智能化,从而产生对外法律效果的行政行为。行政自动化决策在提升行政效率、坚守决策中立等方面意义凸出,但仍暴露出诸多不敷适用之处,尤其表现在责任认定标准存疑、责任主体识别困难、责任范围划分模糊以及侵权赔偿标准混乱等。基于此,当前应依据实际参与原则与契约自由理念厘清政府自动化决策的责任主体,明确政府自动化决策的责任范围,健全政府自动化决策的监督评估机制,形塑以算法解释权、算法拒绝权、损害评估标准为核心的救济机制。
Government automatic decision-making is a kind of administrative act that is participated by artificial intelligence,partially or completely replaces the participation of administrative subjects,and realizes the automation,unmanned and even intelligence of the administrative behavior process,so as to produce external legal effects.The significance of administrative automation decision-making has a prominent significance in improving administrative efficiency and adhering to the decision-making neutrality,but many aspects are still exposed,especially in the doubt of the responsibility identification standard,the difficult identification of the responsibility subject,the fuzy division of the scope of responsibility and the confusion of the tort compensation standard.Based on this,the responsible subject of government automated decision-making should be clarified according to the principle of actual participation and the concept of freedom of contract;clarify the scope of responsibility of government automated decision-making;improve the supervision and evaluation mechanism of government automated decision-making;form the relief mechanism of algorithm interpretation right,algorithm rejection right and damage assessment standard.
出处
《行政与法》
2024年第5期104-114,共11页
Administration and Law
关键词
政府自动化决策
行政效率
责任认定
责任主体
责任范围
government automation decision-making
administrative efficiency
responsibility determination
responsibility subject
scope of responsibility
