摘要
容错纠错作为习近平法治思想中的重要理念,对于破除改革阻碍、推进国家治理现代化发挥正向激励作用。国家监察体制改革之前,该理念已被党规党纪吸收,伴随着监察体制改革的深入,党规党纪层面的容错纠错机制也愈发成熟,并逐步呈现出向法律层面扩展的倾向。若能充分察觉监察体制改革中容错纠错机制的运作机理、运作方式的法治化变革,因势利导解析容错纠错机制所蕴含的谦抑、法秩序统一等法理内核,适时借鉴吸收党内法规建设经验,补齐法律层面的制度短板,有利于促成容错纠错机制的纪法衔接运用。然而需要注意的是,基于党纪国法规范属性、容错纠错预期的差异化考量,刑法实不宜对容错、纠错等量齐观,而更应着重于容错机制建设,通过违法性阻却事由等手段为党规党纪的介入开辟出足够的纠错空间。此外,也应当明晰容错纠错机制法律化的基本要件,划定容错纠错机制运行的边界范畴,以防有条件的容错免责被变成纵错。
Fault tolerance and correction,as an important concept in Xi Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law,plays a positive incentive role in breaking the obstacles of reform and promoting the modernization of state governance.Before the reform of the national supervision system,this concept has been absorbed by the Party's rules and disciplines.With the deepening of the reform,the fault tolerance and correction mechanism of the Party's rules and disciplines has become more mature,and gradually shows a tendency to expand to the legal level.If we can be fully aware of the rule of law in the operation mechanism and operation mode of the fault tolerance and correction mechanism in the reform of the supervision system,analyze the modesty and unity of the legal order implied in the fault tolerance and correction mechanism,learn from the experience of the construction of intraparty rules and regulations,and make up for the shortcomings of the legal level,it is conducive to promote the convergence of the application of the fault tolerance and correction mechanism.However,it should be noted that,based on the different normative attributes and expectations of fault tolerance and correction of the Party's disciplines and state laws,the criminal law should not regard fault tolerance and correction equally,but should emphasize the construction of the fault tolerance mechanism,and open up enough room for the intervention of the Party's rules and disciplines by means of the prevention of illegality.In addition,the basic requirements of the legalization of the fault tolerance and correction mechanism should be clarified,and the boundary of the operation of the fault tolerance and correction mechanism should be delineated.
作者
蒋凌申
林敦金
Jiang Lingshen;Lin Dunjin
出处
《党内法规研究》
2024年第2期86-102,共17页
Research on Intraparty Rules and Regulations
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目“反腐败跨境追赃之刑民协作机制研究”(19BFX098)。
关键词
监察体制改革
容错纠错机制
纪法衔接
supervision system reform
fault tolerance and error correction mechanism
connection between discipline and law
