摘要
我国担保立法历来不承认流质条款的效力,此种禁令式立法反映了大陆法系传统法理在公平和效率价值间的权衡。《民法典》采纳“转换法理”缓和了对流质的全面禁止,但禁令的立法目的在商事领域的适用性仍然存疑,现行规定难以适配商事流质的特殊需求,可能在民商合一的立法例下产生不当的体系效应。为进一步解禁商事流质条款,建议对《民法典》第401条和428条进行目的论限缩,通过解释论将符合特定条件的商事流质情形排除在其适用范围之外。
The fluidity clause has traditionally been denied in China’s guarantee legislation in its effectiveness.This type of prohibitive legislation reflects the tradeoff between equity and efficiency values in the traditional legal principles in the continental law system.The PRC Civil Code adopts the“transformation legal principles,”which has eased the comprehensive ban on fluidity clauses.However,the legislative purpose behind the ban remains questionable regarding its applicability in the commercial context,as current regulations struggle to adapt to the specific requirements of commercial fluidity,potentially causing unintended systemic effects within the unified civil-commercial legislative framework.To further lift the ban on commercial fluidity clauses,this paper suggests a teleological restriction on articles 401 and 428 of the PRC Civil Code,excluding eligible commercial fluidity scenarios that meet specific conditions from their scope of application through interpretation.
作者
王佳舒
曹怡昕
WANG Jia-shu;CAO Yi-xin(Law School,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200050,China;Law School,Fudan University,Shanghai 200082,China)
出处
《山东青年政治学院学报》
2024年第3期93-101,共9页
Journal of Shandong Youth University of Political Science
关键词
流质条款
商事流质
立法目的
民商合一
目的论限缩
fluidity clauses
commercial fluidity
legislative purpose
unified civil-commercial legislation
teleological restriction
