摘要
从基于不同后承关系的逻辑理论的比较入手,借鉴科学理论的选择标准,提出了一种对相互竞争的逻辑进行比较的一般方法论——溯因方法论。作者以溯因方法论为依托,论证了在解决语义悖论的方案中,修正经典逻辑而保留真的去引号原则所需要付出的代价远比通常认为的更高,由此为保留经典逻辑而限制或修改真的去引号原则提供辩护。
This paper begins with a comparison of logical theories based on different consequence relations,and by drawing on the criteria for the selection of scientific theories,it proposes a general methodology for comparing competing logics—the abductive methodology.Relying on the abductive methodology,the author argues that in solutions to semantic paradoxes,the cost of revising classical logic while preserving the disquotational principle for truth is much higher than commonly thought.This provides a defense for retaining classical logic by restricting or modifying the disquotational principle for truth.
出处
《河南社会科学》
北大核心
2024年第5期107-118,共12页
Henan Social Sciences
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“当代逻辑哲学重大前沿问题研究”(17ZDA024)。
关键词
逻辑后承
溯因方法论
语义悖论
逻辑比较
经典逻辑
真的去引号原则
Logical Consequence
Abductive Methodology
Semantic Paradox
Comparison of Logic
Classical Logic
Disquotational Principle for Truth
