摘要
客观、科学、完整、准确的学术史回顾,既是党史研究学术论文写作的一种必备要素和基本规范,也极大地有利于研究者发现“新问题”“新维度”以及全面掌握学术进展,从而更好地明确特定历史问题研究的学术方位、意义和价值。但在近些年的投稿论文中,学术史回顾的写作仍然存在很多难以尽述的弊端,不仅直接导致一大批学术论文无法正常发表和传播,而且给学术编辑工作带来很多无谓的负担和困惑。学术期刊及其编辑有必要在日常工作过程中仔细清理和科学总结一些问题与不足,从“负面清单”的角度分析如何改进学术史回顾的理念和写法,借此努力重塑党史研究的学术规范和写作规范。
An objective,scientific,complete,and accurate academic history review is not only an essential element and basic standard for writing academic papers on the history research of the CPC,but also greatly beneficial for researchers to discover"new problems"and"new dimensions",as well as comprehensively grasp academic progress,so as to better clarify the academic orientation,significance,and value of specific historical problem research.However,in recent years,there are still many shortcomings in the writing of academic history reviews,which are difficult to describe.This not only directly leads to a large number of academic papers being unable to be published and disseminated normally,but also brings a lot of unnecessary burden and confusion to academic edi-ting work.It is necessary for academic journals and their editors to carefully clean up and scientifi-cally summarize some problems and shortcomings in their daily work,analyze how to improve the concept and writing style of academic history reviews from the perspective of a"negative list",and strive to reshape the academic and writing norms of party history research.
出处
《苏区研究》
CSSCI
2024年第2期110-128,共19页
关键词
党史研究学术论文
学术史回顾
学术规范
写作规范
academic papers on the history research of the CPC
academic history review
academic norms
writing norms