期刊文献+

党史研究学术论文写作中的学术史回顾问题探赜

Exploration of Problems in the Writing of Academic History Review in Academic Papers on the History Research of the CPC
下载PDF
导出
摘要 客观、科学、完整、准确的学术史回顾,既是党史研究学术论文写作的一种必备要素和基本规范,也极大地有利于研究者发现“新问题”“新维度”以及全面掌握学术进展,从而更好地明确特定历史问题研究的学术方位、意义和价值。但在近些年的投稿论文中,学术史回顾的写作仍然存在很多难以尽述的弊端,不仅直接导致一大批学术论文无法正常发表和传播,而且给学术编辑工作带来很多无谓的负担和困惑。学术期刊及其编辑有必要在日常工作过程中仔细清理和科学总结一些问题与不足,从“负面清单”的角度分析如何改进学术史回顾的理念和写法,借此努力重塑党史研究的学术规范和写作规范。 An objective,scientific,complete,and accurate academic history review is not only an essential element and basic standard for writing academic papers on the history research of the CPC,but also greatly beneficial for researchers to discover"new problems"and"new dimensions",as well as comprehensively grasp academic progress,so as to better clarify the academic orientation,significance,and value of specific historical problem research.However,in recent years,there are still many shortcomings in the writing of academic history reviews,which are difficult to describe.This not only directly leads to a large number of academic papers being unable to be published and disseminated normally,but also brings a lot of unnecessary burden and confusion to academic edi-ting work.It is necessary for academic journals and their editors to carefully clean up and scientifi-cally summarize some problems and shortcomings in their daily work,analyze how to improve the concept and writing style of academic history reviews from the perspective of a"negative list",and strive to reshape the academic and writing norms of party history research.
作者 吴志军 Wu Zhijun
出处 《苏区研究》 CSSCI 2024年第2期110-128,共19页
关键词 党史研究学术论文 学术史回顾 学术规范 写作规范 academic papers on the history research of the CPC academic history review academic norms writing norms
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1李连江作..学者的术与道[M],2022:274.
  • 2韦伯著..科学作为天职[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2018.
  • 3中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局..马克思恩格斯全集 第26卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2014:1003.
  • 4(美)阿兰·梅吉尔(Allan,Megill)..历史知识与历史谬误[M],2019:342页.
  • 5何兆武..历史理论与史学理论 近现代西方史学著作选[M].北京:商务印书馆,2021:957.
  • 6傅杰作..我的读书经验 好书是可以读一辈子的[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2021:152.
  • 7(美)安东尼·格拉夫敦张弢,王春华..脚注趣史[M],2014:348页.
  • 8桑兵.对话前贤与标高学术[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020,59(6):122-130. 被引量:3
  • 9仲伟民作,谭徐锋总..日知文丛 直面人文学术危机[M],2022:167.
  • 10桑兵.《论持久战》的言说对象[J].社会科学战线,2020(7):98-113. 被引量:7

二级参考文献5

共引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部