期刊文献+

安罗替尼单药在PS评分差的广泛期小细胞肺癌二线治疗中的临床疗效 被引量:4

Clinical efficacy of anlotinib monotherapy in second-line treatment of extensive stage small cell lung cancer with poor PS score
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探究安罗替尼单药在一线标准方案治疗失败且体力状况(PS)评分差的广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)二线治疗中的临床疗效和安全性。方法选取2021年1月至2022年12月安徽省阜阳市人民医院经一线标准方案治疗失败且PS评分差的ES-SCLC患者33例,所有患者二线治疗均口服安罗替尼10 mg,服用2周停1周,21 d为1周期,直至疾病进展或患者不可耐受。观察客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和不良反应,采用Kaplan-Meier法估算患者无进展生存期(PFS),Cox回归模型分析PFS的影响因素。结果安罗替尼单药治疗至少2个周期后,33例患者中无完全缓解,部分缓解5例,病情稳定17例,疾病进展11例,ORR为15.2%(5/33),DCR为66.7%(22/33)。患者中位PFS为3.7个月(95%CI为2.9~4.5个月)。单因素分析显示,一线复发时间(χ^(2)=4.90,P=0.027)、脑转移(χ^(2)=12.42,P<0.001)、肝转移(χ^(2)=11.05,P=0.001)和控制营养状况(CONUT)评分(χ^(2)=12.43,P<0.001)均是安罗替尼单药治疗经一线治疗失败且PS评分差的ES-SCLC患者PFS的影响因素;多因素分析显示,脑转移(HR=3.21,95%CI为1.24~8.29,P=0.016)、肝转移(HR=2.80,95%CI为1.03~7.61,P=0.044)和CONUT评分(HR=2.72,95%CI为1.16~6.38,P=0.021)均是安罗替尼单药治疗经一线治疗失败且PS评分差的ES-SCLC患者PFS的独立影响因素。常见不良反应为乏力、高血压、食欲减退等,大部分不良反应为1~2级,3级不良反应发生率为9.1%(3/33),无4~5级不良反应。结论安罗替尼单药在一线标准方案治疗失败且PS评分差的ES-SCLC二线治疗中的临床疗效较好,不良反应可控。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of anlotinib monotherapy in second-line treatment of extensive stage small cell lung cancer(ES-SCLC)with poor performance status(PS)score after treatment failure with first-line standard regimen.Methods Thirty-three patients with ES-SCLC who failed to receive first-line standard treatment and had poor PS score were selected from Fuyang People's Hospital of Anhui Province from January 2021 to December 2022.All patients were given anrotinib 10 mg orally for second-line treatment,which was taken for 2 weeks and stopped for 1 week,with every 21 days being a cycle period,until the disease progressed or the patient became intolerable.Objective response rate(ORR),disease control rate(DCR)and adverse reactions were observed.Progression-free survival(PFS)was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method,and the influencing factors of PFS were analyzed by Cox regression model.Results After at least 2 cycles of anlotinib monotherapy,there were no complete remission,5 cases of partial remission,17 cases of stable disease,11 cases of progressive disease.ORR was 15.2%(5/33),DCR was 66.7%(22/33).The median PFS was 3.7 months(95%CI:2.9-4.5 months).Univariate analysis showed that first-line recurrence time(χ^(2)=4.90,P=0.027),brain metastases(χ^(2)=12.42,P<0.001),liver metastases(χ^(2)=11.05,P=0.001)and controlling nutritional status(CONUT)score(χ^(2)=12.43,P<0.001)were the influential factors of PFS in ES-SCLC patients with poor PS score and first-line treatment failure of anlotinib monotherapy.Multivariate analysis showed that brain metastases(HR=3.21,95%CI:1.24-8.29,P=0.016),liver metastases(HR=2.80,95%CI:1.03-7.61,P=0.044)and CONUT score(HR=2.72,95%CI:1.16-6.38,P=0.021)were independent influencing factors of PFS in ES-SCLC patients with first-line treatment failure of anlotinib monotherapy and poor PS score.Common adverse reactions were fatigue,hypertension,anorexia,etc.Most of the adverse reactions were grade 1-2,with the incidence of grade 3 adverse reactions being 9.1%(3/33)
作者 黄锐 张允清 Huang Rui;Zhang Yunqing(Department of Radiation Oncology,Fuyang People's Hospital of Anhui Province,Fuyang 236000,China)
出处 《国际肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2023年第12期705-710,共6页 Journal of International Oncology
关键词 小细胞肺癌 治疗学 安罗替尼 Small cell lung carcinoma Therapeutics Anlotinib
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1王金万,孙燕,刘永煜,于起涛,张沂平,李凯,朱允中,周清华,侯梅,管忠震,李维廉,庄武,王东林,梁后杰,秦凤展,卢辉山,刘晓晴,孙红,张燕军,王杰军,罗素霞,杨瑞合,涂远荣,王秀问,宋恕平,周静敏,游丽芬,王竞,姚晨.重组人血管内皮抑素联合NP方案治疗晚期NSCLC随机、双盲、对照、多中心Ⅲ期临床研究[J].中国肺癌杂志,2005,8(4):283-290. 被引量:626
  • 2SIEGEL R, WARD E, BRAWLEY O, et al, Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61 (4):212-236. 被引量:1
  • 3GOVINDAN R, PAGE N, MORGENSZTERN D, et al. Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(28):4539-4544. 被引量:1
  • 4KURUP A, HANNA N H. Treatment of small-cell lung cancer[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2004, 52(2):117-126. 被引量:1
  • 5CHENG S, EVANS W K, STYS-NORMAN D, et al. Chemotherapy for relapsed small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and practice guideline[J].J Thorac Oncol, 2007, 2(4):348-354. 被引量:1
  • 6O'BRIEN M E, CIULEANU T E, TSEKOV H, et al. Phase III trial comparing supportive care alone with supportive care with oral topotecan in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(34):5441-5447. 被引量:1
  • 7ECKARDT J R, VON PAWEL J, PUJOL J L, et al. Phase III study of oral compared with intravenous topotecan as second-line therapy in small- cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(15):2086-2092. 被引量:1
  • 8ROSTI G, BEVILACQUA G, BIDOLI P, et al. Small-cell lung cancer[J]. Ann Oncol, 2006, 17(Suppl 2):ii5-10. 被引量:1
  • 9FERRALDESCHI R, BAKA S, JYOTI B, et al. Modern management of small-cell lung cancer[J]. Drugs,2007, 67(15):2135-2152. 被引量:1
  • 10CALIFANO R, ABIDIN A Z, PECK R, et al. Management of small-cell lung cancer: recent developments for optimal care[J]. Drugs, 2012, 72(4):471-490. 被引量:1

共引文献24

同被引文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部