期刊文献+

“亲密”抑或“声望”:空间距离隐喻对广告态度的影响

"Intimacy"or"Reputation":The Influence of Spatial Distance Metaphor on Advertising Attitude
原文传递
导出
摘要 空间距离深刻影响消费者心理及广告效果评价。研究聚焦于不同空间距离影响消费者产品态度的具体作用机制。通过2个探索性实验和1个正式实验,研究发现亲密感和声望感会中介空间距离对产品态度的影响,通过产品类型(拟人化vs.非拟人化)这一调节变量的引入,研究廓清了不同中介机制发挥作用的边界条件。具体而言,面对拟人化产品时,近距离的产品视觉呈现会提高消费者的亲密感,进而提高产品态度;面对非拟人化产品时,远距离的产品视觉呈现会提高消费者的声望感,进而提高产品态度。 As an essential part of advertising visual cues,spatial distance has a profound impact on both consumer psychology and advertising effect evaluation.This study focuses on the visual spatial distance between advertising products and consumers,and explores the specific mechanism of different spatial distance affecting consumers'product attitudes.Through two exploratory experiments and one formal experiment,this study finds that intimacy and reputation mediates the influence of spatial distance on product attitudes.With the introduction of the moderating variable of product type(anthropomorphic vs.non-anthropomorphic),this study has clarified the boundary conditions under which different mediating mechanisms function.Specifically,when faced with anthropomorphic products,the close visual presentation of the product will prime the consumer's sense of intimacy,and then improve their product attitude;While facing non-anthropomorphic products,the visual presentation of products from a distance will activate the consumer's sense of reputation,which in turn will enhance their product attitude.The research results provide a new perspective for advertising effectiveness research and strategic guidance for advertising practice.
作者 宣长春 XUAN Chang-chun
出处 《新闻大学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第2期71-86,119,120,共18页 Journalism Research
基金 国家社科基金青年项目“基于计算方法的社交媒体广告社会效果与综合治理研究”(21CXW015)。
关键词 空间距离 空间隐喻 广告效果 实验法 spatial distance spatial metaphor advertising effect experimental method
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献100

  • 1柳思维,尹元元.色彩营销及其策略运用[J].商业经济与管理,2004(7):26-29. 被引量:16
  • 2杨保军.试析具体真实与整体真实的含义[J].阴山学刊,2005,18(6):5-12. 被引量:8
  • 3陈俊,贺晓玲,张积家.反事实思维两大理论:范例说和目标-指向说[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(3):416-422. 被引量:31
  • 4Aaker Jennifer, Fournier Susan, Brasel S Adam. When Good Brands Do Bad [ J ]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2004, 31 (1) :p1 -16. 被引量:1
  • 5Kyeonghui Kim ; Meng Zhang ; Xiuping Li. Effects of Tem- poral and Social Distance on Consumer Evaluations [ J ]. Jour- nal of Consumer Research, 2008, 35 (4) :706 -713. 被引量:1
  • 6Trope Yaacov, Liberman Nira, Wakslak Cheryl. Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behaviour [ J ]. Journal of Con- sumer Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 2007, 17 (2) :83 -95. 被引量:1
  • 7Marconi Joe. Crisis Marketing: When Bad Things Happen to Good Companies [ M ]. Chicago : American Marketing Asso- ciation, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 8Pearson, Christine M, Ian I Mitroff. From Crisis Prone to Cri- sis Prepared: A Framework for Crisis Management [ J ]. Academy of Management Fxecutive, 1993, 7(1) :48 -59. 被引量:1
  • 9Herr, Paul M, Frank R Kardes, John Kim Effects of Word - of- Mouth and Product -Attribute Infonnation~on Persuasion: An Accessibility- Diagnosticity Perspective [J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1991, 17(March) : 454-462. 被引量:1
  • 10Wright Peter. The Harassed Decision Maker: Time Pres- sures, Distractions, and the Use of Evidence [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59 (May) : 555 -561. 被引量:1

共引文献163

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部