摘要
随着近年来人工智能的发展,关于其是否会取代人类作家的讨论日益增多。与二十多年前希利斯·米勒提出的“文学终结论”相比,人工智能给文学创作带来的挑战堪称一次新的“文学终结论”,它直接关涉到文学创作主体的本质和地位问题。目前,学界对于人工智能写作持两种不同态度,体现了人类中心主义与反人类中心主义、主体性与反主体性的二元思维方式。事实上,讨论人工智能写作主体性问题应该摒弃这种二元思维方式,重新回归到对文学创作论的反思上来。传统文论将创作主体视为作者情感思想的表达和语言能力的呈现,但人工智能的出现为理解创作主体性提供了新视角。从创作原理角度看,思维与语言的同构性使人工智能写作具有了“准主体”性;从审美意蕴角度看,人工智能揭示出审美的公共性问题,为理解文学创作主体带来新的可能。
With the development of artificial intelligence in recent years,there has been increasing discussion about whether it will replace human writers.Compared to the"End of Literature"theory pro-posed by Hillis Miller twenty years ago,the challenges that artificial intelligence brings to literary crea-tion can be regarded as a new"End of Literature"theory,directly related to the nature and status of the literary creation subject.At present,academia holds two different positions on AI writing,reflecting the dualistic thinking framework of anthropocentrism vs.anti-anthropocentrism and subjectivity vs.anti-sub-jectivity.In fact,when discussing the subjectivity of AI writing,we should abandon this binary way of thinking and return to the reflection on the theories of literary creation.Traditionally,literary theories re-gard the creative subjectivity as the expression of the authors′emotional thoughts and the presentation of their language ability,but the emergence of artificial intelligence provides a new method to understand the creative subjectivity.From the perspective of literary creation principles,the isomorphism of thinking and language makes artificial intelligence writing"quasi-subjective".From the perspective of aesthetic connotation,artificial intelligence reveals the public issues of aesthetics and brings new possibilities for understanding the subject of literary creation.
作者
杨宁
YANG Ning(College of Liberal Arts,Minzu University of China,Beijing 100081,China)
出处
《广州大学学报（社会科学版）》
CAS
CSSCI
2024年第2期25-34,共10页
Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition
基金
中央民族大学青年教师科研能力提升计划项目(2023QNTS07)。
关键词
人工智能
文学终结论
创作主体
人类中心主义
作者之死
artificial intelligence
end of literature
subject of creation
anthropocentrism
death of the author
