期刊文献+

儿童胸部CT辐射剂量指标比较及扫描前剂量预算回归模型的建立

Comparisons of chest CT radiation dose indexes in children and establishment of the regression models for prescaned radiation dose calculation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较容积CT剂量指数(CTDI_(VOL))与基于水当量直径(DW)的体型特异性剂量估算值(SSDE_(DW))在辐射剂量衡量上的差异,分析CTDI_(VOL)、SSDE_(DW)、剂量长度乘积(DLP)与儿童年龄(Age)、胸围(CC)的相关性,建立快速计算CTDI_(VOL)、SSDE_(DW)、DLP的回归模型。方法回顾性分析2021年1月—12月我院748例儿童胸部影像学资料,根据年龄分为<5岁、5~≤10岁及10~≤15岁3个年龄组。手动测量最中间横断面图像的兴趣区面积(A_(ROI))及CT值(CT_(ROI)),计算基于DW的SSDE_(DW),使用t检验比较不同年龄段CTDI_(VOL)与SSDE_(DW)间差异。Pearson分析CTDI_(VOL)、SSDE_(DW)、DLP与Age、CC间相关性,建立基于Age、CC计算CTDI_(VOL)、SSDE_(DW)、DLP的回归模型并对其准确性进行分析。结果所有患儿CTDI_(VOL)为(3.05±0.72)mGy;SSDE_(DW)为(5.69±0.87)mGy;CTDI_(VOL)较SSDE_(DW)低46.40%,二者间比较差异有统计学意义(t=-241.95,P<0.001)。基于Age的回归模型:CTDI_(VOL):y=1.78exp(0.06 x)(x=Age,R^(2)=0.64);SSDE_(DW):y=4.16exp(0.03 x)(x=Age,R^(2)=0.51);DLP:y=40.10exp(0.09 x)(x=Age,R^(2)=0.81);基于CC的回归模型:CTDI_(VOL):y=-0.76+0.06x(x=CC,R^(2)=0.84);SSDE_(DW):y=0.06x+1.99(x=CC,R^(2)=0.55);DLP:y=-84.26+2.96x(x=CC,R^(2)=0.81)。基于变量Age、CC计算CTDI_(VOL)其误差分别为(0.13±0.10)、(0.09±0.06);基于变量Age、CC计算SSDE_(DW)其误差分别为(0.10±0.06)、(0.09±0.07);基于变量Age、CC计算DLP其误差分别为(0.13±0.09)、(0.13±0.10);基于CC计算的辐射剂量指标其误差值较Age小。结论在儿童胸部CT辐射剂量衡量上,CTDI_(VOL)较SSDE_(DW)低估其辐射剂量,使用SSDE_(DW)更为精确;使用年龄、胸围作为水当量直径的替代指征来预计算患儿的辐射剂量指标,可以在检查前快速预算其辐射,对于辐射剂量更好的控制具有重要作用。 Objective To compare the difference between the volume CT dose index(CTDI_(VOL))and the size-specific dose estimate(SSDE_(DW))based on the water equivalent diameter(DW)in the measurement of radiation dose,and analyze the correlations of CTDI_(VOL),SSDE_(DW) and dose length production(DLP)with age and,chest circumference(CC)and establish a regression model for rapid calculation of CTDI_(VOL),SSDE_(DW) and DLP.Methods The imaging data of 748 children of chest were retrospectively analyzed.According to age,they were divided into three groups:<5 years old,5~≤10 years old and 10~≤15 years old.We manually measured the area of interest(A_(ROI))and CT value(CT_(ROI))on the representative central cross-sectional image,calculated the SSDE_(DW) based on DW,and compared the differences between CTDI_(VOL) and SSDE_(DW) at different age groups using t-test.Pearson analysis was performed to test the correlations of CTDI_(VOL),SSDE_(DW) and DLP with age and CC.Consequently,we established regression models based on age and CC to calculate CTDI_(VOL),SSDE_(DW) and DLP,and analyzed the accuracy of the models.Results CTDI_(VOL) of all children was(3.05±0.72)mGy,SSDE_(DW) was(5.69±0.87)mGy,CTDI_(VOL) was 46.40%lower than SSDE_(DW),and the difference was statistically significant(t=-241.95,P<0.001).Age-based regression models were developed as follows:CTDI_(VOL):y=1.78exp(0.06 x)(x=Age,R^(2)=0.64);SSDE_(DW):y=4.16exp(0.03 x)(x=Age,R^(2)=0.51);DLP:y=40.10exp(0.09 x)(x=Age,R^(2)=0.81).Regression models based on CC were also established:CTDI_(VOL):y=-0.76+0.06x(x=CC,R^(2)=0.84);SSDE_(DW):y=0.06x+1.99(x=CC,R^(2)=0.55);DLP:y=-84.26+2.96x(x=CC,R^(2)=0.81).The errors of CTDI_(VOL) calculated based on the variables including age and CC were(0.13±0.10)and(0.09±0.06),respectively,and there was no statistically significant difference between them(t=11.92,P<0.001);the errors of SSDE_(DW) calculated based on age and CC were(0.10±0.06)and(0.09±0.07),respectively,and there was no significant difference between them(t=-17.41,P<0.001);the er
作者 张见 刘杰 张朋 张晓军 ZHANG Jian;LIU Jie;ZHANG Peng;ZHANG Xiaojun(Department of Radiology,Children′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210000,China)
出处 《西部医学》 2024年第4期565-569,共5页 Medical Journal of West China
基金 江苏省政府留学基金项目(JS-2018-137) 江苏省妇幼保健课题(FYX201816) 南京市医学科技发展基金项目(QRX17169)。
关键词 儿童 胸部 体层摄影术 X射线计算机 辐射剂量 回归模型 Child Chest Tomography X-ray computed Radiation dosage Regression model
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献88

  • 1张博,龚建平.CT检查辐射致癌风险的研究进展[J].国际医学放射学杂志,2009,32(3):217-220. 被引量:39
  • 2Rebecca SB. Is computed tomography safe?[J]. New Engl J Med, 2010, 363(1): 1-4. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1002530. 被引量:1
  • 3Brenner DJ, Hricak H. Radiation exposure from medical imaging: time to regulate?[J]. JAMA, 2010, 304(2): 208-209. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.973. 被引量:1
  • 4Larson DB, Wang LL, Podberesky DJ, et al. System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. Part I. Optimization model[J]. Radiology, 2013, 269(1): 167-176. DOI: 10.1148./radiol.13122320. 被引量:1
  • 5Larson DB, Malarik RJ, Hall SM, et al. System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. Part II. Process control system[J]. Radiology, 2013, 269(1): 177-185. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13122321. 被引量:1
  • 6Computer Tomography Subcomittee Group. Size specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. Report of AAPM Task Group 204[R]. College Park: American Association Physicists in Medicine, 2011. 被引量:1
  • 7McNitt-Gray MF. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT[J]. Radiographics, 2002, 22(6): 1541-1553. DOI: 10.1148/rg.226025128. 被引量:1
  • 8Buls N, Van GG, Van CT, et al. Contrast agent and radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT by a combination of low tube voltage and advanced image reconstruction algorithms[J]. Eur Radiol, 2015, 25(4): 1023-1031. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3510-5. 被引量:1
  • 9Bauhs JA, Vrieze TJ, Primak AN, et al. CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices[J]. Radiographics, 2008, 28(1): 245-253. DOI: 10.1148/rg.281075024. 被引量:1
  • 10Wilting JE, Zwartkruis A, van Leeuwen MS, et al. A rational approach to dose reduction in CT: individualized scan protocols[J]. Eur Radiol, 2001, 11(12): 2627-2632. 被引量:1

共引文献247

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部