摘要
以实践类型学的分析框架观之,马克思所确立的实践“首要性”在其自身之中已本质性地蕴含了“何种形式的实践是首要的”这一问题,并在后来演进为“劳动首要性”与其他“非—劳动”实践形式首要性之间的理论争论。通过对两者论证策略的对勘,可以看出,中国马克思主义者坚持劳动首要性的论证既不是康德—阿伦特式的等级序阶化策略,也不是黑格尔—哈贝马斯式的等级进化策略,而是采用了特定社会劳动的历史生成这一阐释路径,因而显示出更强的理论合理性。
From the practice-typology perspective,the primacy of practice established by Marx inherently contains the question of“what form of practice is primary”and later evolves into the theoretical competition between the primacy of labor and the primacy of other non-labor's practical forms.In comparing the argumentation strategies of the two,this article finds that the statements on the primacy of labor made by Chinese Marxists neither embraces the Kant-Arendt strategy of hierarchical order,nor does it accept the Hegel-Habermas strategy of hierarchical evolution,instead,it adopts the interpretive path of historical generation of certain social labor and shows stronger theoretical rationality.
作者
张兵
ZHANG Bing(School of Marxism,Shaanxi Normal University)
出处
《中国人民大学学报》
北大核心
2024年第2期172-182,共11页
Journal of Renmin University of China
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“人民至上与唯物史观新发展研究”(23&ZD016)
陕西省社会科学基金项目“马克思与黑格尔关系再研究”(2020A024)阶段性成果。
关键词
实践类型学
实践首要性
劳动首要性
理论关系
Practice-typology
The primacy of practice
The primacy of labor
Theoretical relationship
