摘要
姚雪垠的第一部长篇小说《春暖花开的时候》面世后,曾引起热议。李长之率先评论,不久后,胡风派联合炮轰该小说,姚雪垠愤而回击,茅盾与胡绳等人也纷纷发声,形成了一场声势浩大的论争。李长之先后作的两篇书评,其中一篇已收入《李长之文集》中,另一篇却成为了集外遗珠。李长之的批评看似随意漫谈,其实切中肯綮,与姚雪垠的自评相比,两者不谋而同,与胡风派的刻意抹黑及茅盾、胡绳的“各打五十大板”相比,也显得较为客观公正。但是,李长之在这场论争中并未受到关注,这可能与他和姚雪垠的关系、他的批评方式和文坛地位、文学批评的环境等多种因素有关。从中,不仅可以看出李长之在学界的尴尬处境,还可以窥探当时的文学批评生态。
Yao Xueyin’s first novel,When Spring Blossoms,aroused a heated discussion after its publication.The first reviewer was Li Changzhi,followed immdiatley by the Hu Feng School,whose joint attack met with Yao Xueyin’s angry retaliation.Then Mao Dun and Hu Sheng joined in and the debate became large-scale.Li Changzhi wrote two reviews,one of which is in The Collected Works of Li Changzhi,and the other is lost.Seemingly random,Li’s review is pertinent and consistent with Yao Xueyin's self-evaluation.Compared with the Hu Feng School who deliberately disparaged Yao Xueyin,and with Mao Dun and Hu Sheng who criticised both sides,Li Changzhi is more objective and just.However,Li Changzhi did not attract much attention,possibly due to his relationship with Yao Xueyin,his critical mode,his position in the literary world,and the environment of literary criticism.The debate shows both Li Changzhi’s awkward situation in the academic circle,and the ecology of literary criticism at that time.
作者
李婷
LI Ting(Department of Chinese,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510275)
出处
《汕头大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
2023年第8期25-33,94,共10页
Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
2019年度教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“中国现代文学批评史料编年整理与研究”(19JZD037)。
