期刊文献+

魏晋佛学三大流派之判教

The Determination of the Significance and Status of the Three Main Schools of Buddhism in the Wei and Jin Dynasties
原文传递
导出
摘要 在魏晋时玄佛合流的大潮中所形成的三大佛学派别“本无宗”、“心无宗”和“即色宗”,由开始的借老庄和玄学来“格义”到逐渐摆脱玄学影响而更多地吸收印度佛学因素,接力棒式地走过了一个“由玄入佛”的过程。其中,支遁的“即色宗”作为最后一站,容纳了道安“本无宗”的观点,但去掉了从老庄接过来的“生”之比喻,将“无”理解为“空”;继而又把“心无宗”(连同它的各支脉)也当作自身的一个环节,但并不把“幻化”、“梦觉”和“缘会”等等看作仅仅是消极的东西,而是看作进入“本无”境界的必要的环节。这就完成了对所有六家七宗的综合和总结,在这一逻辑进程中,各家各派都有自己特定的位置和作用,最终则是建立起了一个层次丰富、解释合理、内容全面的大乘空宗学说。但其中仍然不够通透之处在于,在对“色”的理解上仍然是外在地为它找根据,而没有从自否定的眼光把它自身理解为“不自色”的根据,受到僧肇的批评。 In the Wei and Jin dynasties,the three major Buddhist schools,namely,the " School of Original Nonbeing",the " School of Non-existence of Mind" and the " School of Appearance as Such",formed in the tide of Daoist-Buddhist merger.From the beginning,by using "analogy" borrowed from Lao-Zhuang and Confucianism-Daoism to gradually getting rid of the influence of metaphysics and absorbing more factors of Indian Buddhism,they went through a process from Daoist-metaphysics into Buddhism.Among them,Zhi Dun's "School of Appearance as Such",as the last stop,accommodated the viewpoints of Dao An's School of Original Non-being",but removed the metaphor of " existence born from nothing" inherited from LaoZhuang,and understood " nothingness" as " emptiness".Then the " School of Non-existence of Mind"(together with its branches) is also regarded as part of the " School of Appearance as Such" itself,but not as mere negative elements,such as illusions,dreaming,and karmic meetings,but as necessary parts for entering the realm of the " Original Non-being",which completes the synthesis and summary of all the six sects and seven schools,in which each school has its own specific position and role in the logical process,and ultimately establishes a richly layered,rationally interpreted,and comprehensive Mahayana Emptiness Doctrine.However,it is still not thorough enough in the sense that the conception of " appearance" still needs a basis for itself externally,but does not understand itself from the perspective of self-negation as the basis for " non-appearance",and it was criticized by Seng Zhao.
作者 邓晓芒 Deng Xiaomang
出处 《清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 北大核心 2024年第2期136-144,237,238,共11页 Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1邓晓芒著..邓晓芒讲演录[M].长春:长春出版社,2012:262.
  • 2任继愈著..汉唐佛教思想论集[M].北京:人民出版社,1994:458.
  • 3邓晓芒.道家实践形而上学的深化——向秀《庄子注》探微[J].中州学刊,2022(3):101-111. 被引量:3
  • 4邓晓芒.论郭象从道家向儒家的转向[J].学习与探索,2023(2):1-16. 被引量:3
  • 5丁福保编..佛学大辞典 下[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2015:3002.
  • 6任继愈主编..中国佛教史 第2卷[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1985:785.
  • 7汤用彤著..汉魏两晋南北朝佛教史[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2008:609.
  • 8吕澄著..中国佛学流略讲[M].北京:中华书局,1988:396.
  • 9(德)海德格尔(Martin,Heidegger)著,孙周兴译..路标[M].北京:商务印书馆,2000:577.
  • 10(德)海德格尔(Martin,Heidegger)等著,孙周兴等译,刘小枫选编..海德格尔与有限性思想[M].北京:华夏出版社,2002:255.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部