期刊文献+

意图信息透明与互惠意图促进人际信任:来自噪音信任博弈的证据

Intention Information Transparency and Reciprocal Intention Promote Interpersonal Trust:Evidence from The Noisy Trust Game
下载PDF
导出
摘要 信任决策是个体在不确定性下作出是否信任他人的风险性社会决策,是人类社会生活的重要组成部分。研究采用噪音信任博弈范式,旨在从互动环境与主体的双视角出发,验证意图信息透明度以及意图类型与决策结果在信任决策中的重要作用。实验1以无噪音条件作为基线,探索意图信息透明度(清晰vs.模糊)对信任决策的影响。结果发现:被试在意图信息模糊条件下的信任水平显著低于无噪音和意图信息清晰条件;实验2探索在意图信息清晰时,意图类型(互惠vs.违背)与决策结果(收益vs.损失)对信任决策的影响。结果发现:不论结果是收益或损失,互惠意图组被试的信任水平都显著高于违背意图组。研究揭示了在人际互动中意图信息透明和互惠意图均是个体作出信任他人决策的重要依据。 Trust is the willingness to accept vulnerability based upon positive exceptions of other’s behavior or intention.At present,most studies assume that both players are in an environment with sufficient information,and behavioral outcomes can perfectly reflect behavioral intentions.However,most daily interpersonal interactions contain elements of uncertainty or ambiguity,and results are not always consistent with intentions.Two theoretical models of interpersonal trust put forward different views.The result-based model emphasizes that people make decisions based on feedback results in a trust game.The intention-based model argues that what matters in interactions is the perception of other people's intentions.Therefore,some studies focus on the influence of the trust intention of the trustor on the reciprocity behavior of the trustee from the perspective of the trustee,and fail to fully characterize how the intention of the trustee affects the trust decision of the trustor in the trust relationship.This research conducted two studies to explore the effects of intention information transparency and intention types on trust decisions using an adapted Trust Game-Noisy Trust Game(NTG).There is a certain probability that the choice of the trustee will be distorted into the opposite choice.Study 1 was a single-factor within-subject design.The dependent variable was the investment ratios.According to whether the trustee's intent is revealed,intention information was divided into two types:clear intention information and obscure intention information.While the no-noise condition was used as the control condition.Study 2 was a 2(Intention types:reciprocity vs.violation)×2(Decision outcome:gain vs.loss)within-subjects design in the context of clear intention information.The dependent variable was the investment amounts.Because of the noise,The trustee's choice to return(reciprocity)may be distorted to retain keep(lose),and their choice to keep(violation)may be distorted to retain return(gain).The participants invested in a
作者 黄亮 李森 陈永辉 黄文欣 张秀松 陈顺森 Huang Liang;Li Sen;Chen Yonghui;Huang Wenxin;Zhang Xiusong;Chen Shunsen(Institute of Applied Psychology,Minnan Normal University,Zhangzhou,363000;Fujian Key Laboratory of Applied Cognition and Personality,Zhangzhou,363000;Baotou Elderly University,Baotou,014000;Shanghang Zijin Middle School,Longyan,364200)
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2024年第2期402-410,共9页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(20CSH069)的资助。
关键词 意图信息透明度 互惠意图 信任决策 噪音信任博弈 人际信任模型 intention information transparency reciprocal intention trust decisions noisy trust game interpersonal trust model
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献77

  • 1Aimone, J. A., Houser, D. (2012). What you don't know won't hurt you: A laboratory analysis of betrayal aversion. Experimental Economics, 15(4), 571-588. 被引量:1
  • 2Aimone, J. A., Houser, D., & Weber, B. (2014). Neural signatures of betrayal aversion: An fMRI study of trust. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 281(1782), 20132127. 被引量:1
  • 3Barraclough, D. J., Conroy, M. L., & Lee, D. (2004). Prefrontal cortex and decision making in a mixed-strategy game. Nature Neuroscience, 7(4), 404-410. 被引量:1
  • 4Baumgartner, T., Heiurichs, M., Vonlanthen, A., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2008). Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans. Neuron, 58(4), 639-650. 被引量:1
  • 5Bereczkei, T., Deak, A., Papp, P., Perlaki, G., & Orsi, G. (2013). Neural correlates of Machiavellian strategies in a social dilemma task. Brain and Cognition, 82(1), 108-116. 被引量:1
  • 6Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity,and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122-142. 被引量:1
  • 7Bohnet, I., Greig, F., Herrmann, B., & Zeckhauser, R. (2008). Betrayal aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States. American Economic Review, 98(1), 294-310. 被引量:1
  • 8Bob.net, I., & Zeckhauser, R. (2004). Trust, risk and betrayal. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4), 467-484. 被引量:1
  • 9Boudreau, C., McCubbins, M. D., & Coulson, S. (2008). Knowing when to trust others: An ERP study of decision making after receiving information from unknown people. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(1), 23-34. 被引量:1
  • 10Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. New York: Princeton University Press. 被引量:1

共引文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部