摘要
在21世纪,流散已成为重要的全球性现象,流散研究同样随之成为理论研究领域的前沿话题,但目前国内学界对这一概念的缘起、发展和理论脉络还缺乏比较全面和深入的探讨。结合萨夫兰、杜洛连和吉尔罗伊等理论家的相关论述,本文从三个方面对流散进行了探讨:首先,依据流散者的意愿、地区和流散原因等因素,流散可以被分为不同的类型,但不管就何种类型而言,流散者与故土家园的联系、族群意识和流散者相互间的团结都是必须关注的重要话题;其次,跨疆域的流动意味着更为宏阔的视野,对处于非此亦非彼的中间状态的流散者而言,他们往往更能接受一种反本质主义的身份观;最后,流散同样意味着一种文化生产方式,其代表的独特视角、经历和政治立场都将成为跨国性文化生产的重要资源。
During the 21st century,diaspora has become a significant global phenomenon,and diaspora studies have likewise emerged as a cutting-edge topic in theoretical research.However,there still lacks a comprehensive and in-depth exploration of the origins,development,and theoretical context of this concept in Chinese academia.Drawing upon the writings of theorists such as William Safran,Khachig Tölölyan,and Paul Gilroy,this paper examines diaspora from three aspects:first,although diaspora can be categorized into different types based on factors like the diasporic individuals’intentions,geographical regions,and reasons for dispersal,regardless of the type,it is essential to focus on their attachment to their homelands,their ethnic consciousness,and the solidarity among diasporic members;second,transnational mobility implies a broader perspective.For diasporic individuals who find themselves in an intermediate state between“neither here nor there,”they often become more receptive to an anti-essentialist identity outlook;third,diaspora also signifies a mode of cultural production.The unique perspectives,experiences,and political stances it represents will become important resources for transnational cultural production.
作者
何卫华
He Weihua(School of Foreign Languages,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China)
出处
《外国语文研究》
2024年第1期1-8,共8页
Foreign Language and Literature Research
基金
国家社科基金项目“英国文化研究的谱系学和现代转型研究”(项目编号:18BWW015)的阶段性成果。
关键词
流散
身份
“双重意识”
文化生产
政治
diaspora
identity
“double consciousness”
cultural production
politics
