期刊文献+

腹腔镜下胆道镜联合术中胆道造影经胆囊管治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床应用研究 被引量:1

Application of laparoscopic trans-cystic common bile duct exploration combined with choledochofiberscopy and cholangiography for patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜下胆道镜联合术中胆道造影经胆囊管治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床应用价值。方法收集2020年10月至2023年3月湖州市中心医院肝胆胰外科胆囊结石合并胆总管结石行微创治疗113例患者的临床资料,其中腹腔镜下胆道镜联合术中胆道造影经胆囊管行胆总管探查取石术(LTCCBDE组)32例,腹腔镜下经胆总管切开路径探查取石+T管引流术(LTDCBDE组)39例,腹腔镜胆囊切除联合经内镜逆行胰胆管造影+乳头切开取石术(LC+ERCP+EST组)42例,比较3组患者术前及术后ALT、TBil、DBil、IBil、WBC、CRP水平,术后血清淀粉酶(AMY)、手术时间、术中出血量、术后胆瘘发生率、术后住院时间、住院费用及术后6周胃肠疾病生命质量指数(GIQLI)评分的差异。结果LTCCBDE组手术成功32例,术中转行LTDCBDE 4例,LTDCBDE组及LC+ERCP+EST组均手术成功。LTCCBDE组术前WBC、ALT、TBil、IBil及术后CRP、ALT水平与LTDCBDE组比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),术前WBC及术后ALT与LC+ERCP+EST组比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。LTCCBDE组手术时间低于LTDCBDE组及LC+ERCP+EST组(均P<0.05),术中出血量及术后住院时间均低于LTDCBDE组(均P<0.05),与LC+ERCP+EST组比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。LTCCBDE组住院费用及术后6周GIQLI评分与LTDCBDE组及LC+ERCP+EST组比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.001)。结论腹腔镜下胆道镜联合术中胆道造影经胆囊管治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石有较好疗效,可加快患者术后康复及改善生活质量,符合加速康复外科理念,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To explore the clinical application of laparoscopic trans-cystic common bile duct exploration combined with choledochofiberscopy and cholangiography in treatment of patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis.Methods Clinical data of 113 patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis admitted in Huzhou Central Hospital from October 2020 to March 2023 were enrolled,including 32 cases treated by laparoscopic trans-cystic common bile duct exploration combined with choledochofiberscopy and cholangiography(LTCCBDE group),39 cases treated by laparoscopic trans-duct common bile duct exploration plus T-tube drain(LTDCBDE group),and 42 cases treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy+endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography+endoscopic sphincterotomy(LC+ERCP+EST group).The preoperative and postoperative ALT,TBil,DBil,iIBil,WBC,CRP,postoperative amylase(AMY),operative time and intraoperative bleeding,postoperative biliary fistula rate,postoperative hospital stay,hospitalization cost and the perioperative gastrointestinal quality of life index(GIQLI)at 6th week were compared among three groups.Results Among 36 cases scheduled to receive LTCCBDE,4 cases failed and transferred to LTDCBDE.Thirty-nine cases in LTDCBDE group and 42 cases in LC+ERCP+EST group were treated successfully.There were significant differences in preoperative WBC,ALT,TBil,IBil and postoperative CRP and ALT between LTCCBDE and LTDCBDE groups(all P<0.05).There were significantly different in preoperative WBC and postoperative ALT between LTCCBDE and LC+ERCP+EST groups(both P<0.05).The operative time in LTCCBDE group was significantly lower than those in LTDCBDE and LC+ERCP+EST groups(both P<0.05).The intraoperative bleeding and postoperative hospital stay in LTCCBDE group were significantly lower than those in LTDCBDE group(both P<0.05)and there were no significant differences between LTCCBDE and LC+ERCP+EST groups(both P>0.05).There were statistically significant in hospitalization costs and postoperative GIQLI scores at 6th week in LTCCBDE group
作者 岑峰 孙旭 沈洋 胡丕波 潘治平 严强 CEN Feng;SUN Xu;SHEN Yang;HU Pibo;PAN Zhiping;YAN Qiang(Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery,Huzhou Central Hospital(the Affiliated Huzhou Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine/the Affiliated Central Hospital of Huzhou University),Huzhou Key Laboratory of Intelligent and Digital Precision surgery,Huzhou 313000,China;不详)
出处 《浙江医学》 CAS 2024年第3期280-285,327,I0006,共8页 Zhejiang Medical Journal
基金 湖州市科学技术局公益性应用研究项目(2021GYB21)。
关键词 胆总管结石 胆囊结石 胆总管探查 胆囊管 腹腔镜 Choledocholithiasis Cholecystolithiasis Common bile duct exploration Cystic duct Laparoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献69

  • 1陈安平,高珂,刘安,温宜清,黄纪伟,肖宏,田刚,宋安宁.腹腔镜胆总管探查即时缝合术434例临床应用体会[J].中国实用外科杂志,2005,25(2):97-98. 被引量:34
  • 2陈安平,肖宏,温宜清,刘安,田刚,宋安宁,高珂,黄纪伟.腹腔镜胆总管探查术的临床应用(附822例报告)[J].中国实用外科杂志,2005,25(6):365-366. 被引量:41
  • 3田大广,黄洁,张捷,冉江华,魏晓平,董国海.LC与EST联合应用治疗胆囊结石继发性胆总管结石[J].中国普通外科杂志,2006,15(8):579-581. 被引量:37
  • 4Tinoco R, Tinoco A, E1-Kadre L, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration[J]. Ann Surg,2008,247(4) :674-679. 被引量:1
  • 5Shively EH, Richardson M, Romines R, et al. Laparoscopic com- mon bile duct exploration in 90-bed rural hospital [ J ]. Am Surg, 2010,76(6) :626-629. 被引量:1
  • 6Savita KS, Bhartia VK. Laparoscopic CBD exploration[J]. Indian J Surg,2010,72(5 ) :395-399. 被引量:1
  • 7Hong DF, Xin Y, Chen DW. Comparison of laparoscopic chole- cystectomy combined with intraoperatlve endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of tie common bile duet for cholecys- tocboledocbolithiasis[J]. Surg Endose,2006,20(3) :424-427,. 被引量:1
  • 8Yin Z, Xu K, Sun J, et al. Is the end of the T-tube drainage era in laparoscopic cboledochotomy for common bile duct stones is coming? A systematic review and meta-analysis[ J]. Ann Surg, 2013,257(1 ) :54-66. 被引量:1
  • 9Zhang W J, Xu GF, Wu GZ, et el. Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with primary closure versus T-tube drainage: a randomized clinical trial [ J ]. J Surg Res,2009,157 ( 1 ) : e1 -5. 被引量:1
  • 10Leida Z, Ping B, Shuguang W, et al. A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic cboledochotomy [ J]. Surg Endose, 2008,22 ( 7 ) : 1595-1600. 被引量:1

共引文献270

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部