摘要
目的 研究不同磁刺激盆底模式治疗围绝经期盆底肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPSS)的临床效果。方法 选取2022年5月至2023年5月该院临床诊断为MPSS的围绝经期女性60例作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为A、B、C组,每组20例。3组患者均给予盆底肌筋膜手法松解治疗;A组给予盆底磁刺激治疗(10 Hz和50 Hz交替);B组给予骶神经根磁刺激治疗(50 Hz);C组同时给予盆底磁刺激联合骶神经根磁刺激治疗。3组每周治疗2次,连续治疗8周。分别于治疗前后采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估盆底肌筋膜压痛程度,Glazer盆底表面肌电评估盆底肌肉功能。结果 与治疗前比较,3组治疗后主观疼痛VAS评分、盆底肌筋膜压痛VAS评分均有降低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后与A、B组比较,C组主观疼痛VAS评分、盆底肌筋膜压痛VAS评分明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与治疗前比较,3组治疗后前静息电位、后静息电位的平均波幅及变异系数(CV)均降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);与治疗前比较,仅C组快速收缩最大波幅,10 s持续收缩、60 s持久收缩的平均波幅及CV均有改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);与A、B组比较,C组治疗后前静息电位、后静息电位的平均波幅及变异系数(CV)均降低,快速收缩最大波幅和10 s持续收缩、60 s持久收缩的平均波幅及CV均有改善,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 盆底磁刺激和骶神经根磁刺激治疗围绝经期MPSS均可有效缓解疼痛,改善盆底肌力,两者联合应用的效果最好。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of different magnetic stimulation pelvic floor modes in the treatment of perimenopausal myofascial pelvic pain syndrome(MPSS).Methods A total of 60 perimenopausal women who were clinically diagnosed with MPSS in the hospital from May 2022 to May 2023 were selected as the research objects.They were divided into groups A,B and C by random number table method,with 20 cases in each group.All patients in the three groups were treated with pelvic floor myofascial manual release.Group A was given pelvic floor magnetic stimulation(alternating 10 Hz and 50 Hz),group B was given sacral nerve root magnetic stimulation(50 Hz),and group C was given pelvic floor magnetic stimulation combined with sacral nerve root magnetic stimulation at the same time.The three groups were treated twice a week for eight weeks.Visual analogue scale(VAS)was used to evaluate the degree of pelvic floor myofascial tenderness before and after treatment,and Glazer pelvic floor surface electromyography was used to evaluate pelvic floor muscle function.Results Compared with before treatment,the VAS scores of subjective pain and pelvic floor myofascial tenderness in the three groups were decreased after treatment,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with group A and group B,the VAS score of subjective pain and the VAS score of pelvic floor myofascial tenderness in group C were significantly decreased after treatment,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with before treatment,the average amplitude and coefficient of variation(CV)of pre-rest potential and post-rest potential in the three groups were decreased after treatment,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with before treatment,only the maximum amplitude of rapid contraction,the average amplitude of 10 s sustained contraction and 60 s sustained contraction and CV in group C were improved,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with group
作者
汪玲玲
黄惠萍
陈鸣华
李嫜洁
马芮
许晶
WANG Lingling;HUANG Huiping;CHEN Minghua;LI Zhangjie;MA Rui;XU Jing(Department of Rehabilitation Medicine,Wuxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Wuxi,Jiangsu 214000,China)
出处
《重庆医学》
CAS
2024年第5期712-716,共5页
Chongqing medicine
基金
江苏省卫生健康委员会第三周期省妇幼健康重点学科-妇女保健项目(SFY3-FB2021)。
关键词
盆底磁刺激
骶神经根磁刺激
围绝经期
女性
盆底肌筋膜疼痛综合征
pelvic floor magnetic stimulation
magnetic stimulation of sacral nerve root
perimenopause
women
pelvic floor myofascial pain syndrome
