摘要
融资性贸易合同是名为买卖、实为借贷的合同,其性质及效力认定在司法实践中存在较大争议,现有法律规定不够明确,法院的裁判意见难以统一。正确识别融资性贸易合同的性质,准确适用法律认定合同效力,对于指引商事实践和维护司法权威具有重要作用。人民法院在探寻当事人真实意思表示过程中,应遵循商事外观主义,尊重商事自治,有条件地运用穿透式审判思维进行审查,并进行充分论证说理,进而对融资性贸易合同的性质和效力作出公正合理的认定。此举能够最大限度地保护市场自由、维护市场秩序,为相应的商事实践提供规则指引,维护司法权威。
Financing trade contracts are contracts called sales but actually used to finance,their nature and validity are subject to significant controversy in judicial practice because the existing legal provisions are not clear enough,and the judgment opinions of the court are difficult to be unified.Correctly identifying the nature of financing trade contracts and accurately applying the law to determine the validity of contracts play an important role in guiding commercial practice and maintaining judicial authority.In the process of exploring the true intention of the parties,the people’s courts should follow the doctrine of commercial appearance,respect the autonomy of commercial matters,conditionally use penetrating trial thinking to conduct reviews and make full argumentation and reasoning,so as to make fair and reasonable determinations on the nature and validity of financing trade contracts.This can protect market freedom and maintain market order to the greatest extent,provide rules and guidance for corresponding commercial practices,and safeguard judicial authority.
作者
杨晓航
骆小春
YANG Xiaohang;LUO Xiaochun(School of Law and Politics,Nanjing Tech University,Nanjing 211816,China)
出处
《江苏理工学院学报》
2024年第1期83-89,共7页
Journal of Jiangsu University of Technology
关键词
融资性贸易
名实不符
合同性质
合同效力
穿透式审查
trade finance
mismatch between name and reality
nature of contract
contract validity
penetrating review
