摘要
传统的中医外科派别划分主要有三种,即三分法、五分法、九分法,略以三分法影响较大。随着地域性医学流派研究的发展,外科派别研究受到了来自地域角度的审视。但整体而言,中医外科学术流派的研究仍有诸多问题亟待解决。现有的外科派别划分方案中,涉及到的外科著作只有少数几种,这与现存的外科古籍数量极不相称。或许,从梳理古籍文献的角度来重新认识外科派别,会是一个可探索的方案。
There are three traditional Chinese medicine surgical sects,i.e.the three-point method,the five-point method and the nine-point method,of which the slightly three-point method has a greater impact.With the development of regional medical school research,surgical school research has been examined from a regional perspective.However,there are still many problems to be solved.In the existing classification scheme of surgical factions,only a few surgical works are involved,which is extremely disproportionate to the number of existing surgical ancient books.Perhaps a new understanding of the surgical school from the perspective of reviewing ancient literature would be an exploratory approach.
作者
王缙
罗婕
范天田
莫清莲
陈晓林
WANG Jin;LUO Jie;FAN Tiantian;MO Qinglian;CHEN Xiaolin(Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine,Nanning 530200,China;Institute of Chinese Medical History and Literature,Chinese Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100700,China)
出处
《中华中医药杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2024年第1期78-81,共4页
China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy
基金
国家重点研发计划项目(No.2019YFC1709200)
2019年四川省社会科学重点研究基地“中国出土医学文献与文物研究中心”项目(No.CTYX13)。
关键词
中医外科学
学术流派
正宗派
全生派
心得派
Traditional Chinese medicine surgery
Academic schools
Zheng Zong School
Quan Sheng School
Xin De School
