摘要
扩散研究中经典的S型曲线,在解释中国的政策扩散过程时存在一定的局限性。基于“形式-内核”的二维分析框架,扩散结果可以初步类型化为完全扩散、扩散失败、象征性扩散与再创新性扩散。地方政务服务改革探索中存在多种模式创新,案例追踪研究发现:由于公共政策本身所具有的特性,政策扩散同技术扩散之间具有根本性的差别。一方面,公共政策失败可能导致扩散统计结果出现累计值下降的情况,这就削弱了S型曲线对扩散效果解释的精准性;另一方面,政策本身会根据地方发展差异进行本土化调适。中国地区间发展差异较大使得纯粹意义上的完全扩散和扩散失败,连同象征性扩散都有在成本约束下演化为再创新性扩散的倾向。研究在一定程度上丰富了对地方政府政策再创新行为逻辑的解释。应当明确,未来的政策扩散研究,特别是扩散持续性与稳定性的研究,应当跳出对政策价值的前提预设,对扩散过程中的政策本土化和再创新予以肯定和鼓励。
The classical S-curve in the study of diffusion has some limitations in explaining China’s policy diffusion process.Based on the two-dimensional analysis framework of“Form-Kernel”,the diffusion results can be preliminarily classified into complete diffusion,diffusion failure,symbolic diffusion and reinnovation diffusion.There are various innovation modes in the exploration of local government service reform,it is found in the case tracking research that there is a fundamental difference between policy diffusion and technology diffusion due to the characteristics of public policy itself.On the one hand,the policy failure possibly leads to the cumulative decrease in diffusion statistics results,which weakens the accuracy of the S-curve in the explanation of diffusion effects.On the other hand,the policy itself will be localized and adjusted according to local development differences.The large regional development differences in China make the pure complete diffusion and diffusion failure,together with symbolic diffusion,have a tendency to evolve into re-innovative diffusion under cost constraints.This study has enriched the explanation of the logic of the policy reinnovation behavior of local government to a certain extent.It should also be clear that future research on policy diffusion,especially on the diffusion sustainability and stability,should jump out of the presupposition of policy value,and affirm and encourage the localization and reinnovation in the process of diffusion.
作者
赵志远
伊文敬
ZHAO Zhiyuan;YI Wenjing(Zhou Enlai School of Government,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350)
出处
《长白学刊》
2024年第2期74-86,共13页
Changbai Journal
基金
国家社科基金青年项目“党政机构职责体系优化中的体制机制研究”(23CZZ002)。