期刊文献+

系统安全性评估中飞行机组人为因素的分析方法

Analysis method of flight crew human factors in system safety assessment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着飞机系统日益高度综合复杂和自动化水平逐渐提高,飞行员在应对失效或应急情况时通常准备不足,纠正动作可能是不正确、不及时或不完整的,因此系统安全性评估中迫切需要考虑飞行机组人为因素问题。通过分析CCAR25.1309(b)和(c)条款的要求和飞行机组对失效的处理过程,基于功能危险性评估中的失效状态,提出人为因素需求的捕获方法和人为因素分析方法;通过在型号中应用这些方法,从失效状态向告警和程序的角度实现安全性正向设计,建立安全性评估中飞行机组人为因素的完整适航符合性证据链。结果表明:本文提出的方法可有效表明对CCAR25.1309(b)和(c)条款中人为因素相关的适航符合性。 With the improvement of high complexity and automation level of the aircraft systems,pilots are often ill-prepared to cope with an actual emergency or failure,and their corrective actions may be erroneous,delayed or incomplete.Therefore,there is an urgent need to consider flight crew human factors in system safety assessment.By analyzing the requirements of CCAR25.1309(b)and(c)and failure processing process of flight crew,based on the failure conditions in functional hazard assessment,the methods of requirements capture and analysis of flight crew human factors is proposed.By applying these methods in the aircraft development,the top down design for safety which from failure condition to alert and procedures is achieved,and a complete chain of compliance evidence for human factor of safety is established.The results show that the proposed method can effectively demonstrate airworthiness compliance with human factors of CCAR25.1309(b)and(c).
作者 刘会星 阮宏泽 黎先平 冯臻 LIU Huixing;RUAN Hongze;LI Xianping;FENG Zhen(Aircraft Architecture Integration Engineering Technology Institute,Shanghai Aircraft Design and Research Institute,Shanghai 201210,China)
出处 《航空工程进展》 CSCD 2024年第1期135-140,156,共7页 Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering
关键词 功能危险性评估 人为因素 假设 失效状态 告警 程序 functional hazard assessment human factors assumption failure condition alert procedure
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献31

  • 1李银霞,杨锋,王黎静,袁修干.飞机座舱工效学综合评价研究及其应用[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2005,31(6):652-656. 被引量:19
  • 2赵江洪.人机工程学[M],北京:高等教育出版社,2008. 被引量:10
  • 3曾庆新,庄达民,马银香.脑力负荷与目标辨认[J].航空学报,2007,28(B08):76-80. 被引量:16
  • 4EDUARDO S, DAN M. Human factors in aviation[M]. 2nd ed. Salt Lake City, UT: Academic Press, 2010: 15-20. 被引量:1
  • 5中国民用航空局航空安全办公室.中国民航航空安全报告(2013年)[R].北京:中国民用航空局,2014:5-8. 被引量:1
  • 6WICKENS C D, LEE J D, LIU Y L, et al. Introduction to human factors engineering[M]. 2nd ecl. Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice Ha[[ Inc,, 2003 17-23. 被引量:1
  • 7WIEGMANN D A, SHAPPELL S. A human error analy- sis oi commercial aviation accidents using the human ac- i tors analysis and classification system (HFACS) DOT/ FAA/AM-01/3[R]. Washington, D. C. : U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation, Federal Aviation Adminstration, 2001: 32-41. 被引量:1
  • 8Annual review of aircraft accident data U. S. general avia- tion, Calendar year 2005: NTSB/ARG-o9/OI[R]. Wash- ington, D. C. National Transportation Safety Board, 2005: 1-15. 被引量:1
  • 9Review of US civil aviation accidents, Calendar year 2011 NTSB/ARA-14/01 [R]. Washington, D. C. : National Transportation Safety Board, 2011 : 1-10. 被引量:1
  • 10Review of U. S. civil aviation accidents, 2007-2009.. NTSB/ ARA-]I/O[R]. Washington, D.C. : National Transpor- tation Safety Board, 2011: 5-17. 被引量:1

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部