摘要
理解作为新术语、新范式的课程思政如何生成和作用、其交汇的多重“逻辑”如何互动是课程思政研究及实施的重要理论问题。系统梳理并纳入课程思政所交汇的多重“逻辑”,基于经济学中的公共产品理论和“理性人”分析构建了一个纳入视域、历史和要素/环节的三维课程思政分析框架。研究认为,从宏观视域和公共产品供给视角给出的顶层逻辑和微观视域及学生主体性视角出发的底层逻辑之统一和正反馈机制作用,是课程思政形成和作用的核心理论机制。不同维度间互动可为课程思政教育提供理论、政策渊源以及思政教育资源要素,可为“教师+思政资源—课程(堂)教学—学生”的全流程课程思政教育实施提供激励,实现微观视域的供需适配与宏观视域的政策目标达成、政策激励与调适以及思政教育资源资源共享间的契合。
It is an important theoretical issue for the ideological and political education research to understand how this new paradigm generate and function,and how the multiple-logics of its intersection interact.This paper systematically discusses the multiple-logic of the curriculum ideology and politics,and constructs a three-dimensional curriculum ideological and political analysis framework that includes the horizon,history,elements/links based on the public goods theory.It is pointed that,the unity of the top-level logic,given from the macro perspective and the public goods supply,and the micro-level logic,incorporated the bottom-level logic from the perspective of student subjectivity and the positive feedback mechanism,is the core theoretical mechanism for the formation and function of curriculum ideology and politics.The interaction between different dimensions can provide theoretical,policy sources and ideological and political education resource elements for the curriculum ideological and political education.It can also provide incentives for the implementation of ideological and political education in the whole process of teachers-curriculum(classroom)teaching-students,and achieve the coordination between the supply and demand of the micro-view and the policy objectives of the macro-view.
作者
孙泽生
SUN Ze-sheng(School of Finance and Business,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China)
出处
《集美大学学报（教育科学版）》
2023年第6期1-9,34,共10页
Journal of Jimei University：Education Science Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金后期资助重点项目“中国卫生资源下沉改革:源起、机理与效应”(22FJA003)
上海市高校市级重点课程建设项目(中级宏观经济学)
上海市地方高水平大学教学改革项目“‘4421教学法在通识课教学中的运用探索”(310-C-6131-22-010B01)。
关键词
课程思政
经济学
公共产品
顶层逻辑
底层逻辑
curriculum ideological and political education
economics
public goods theory
top-level logic
bottom-level logic
