摘要
罗马统一私法协会制定的《国际商事合同通则》,虽是具有法律重述性质的示范法文件,但不具有直接的法律约束力。因此,在当事人未明示选择的情况下,不宜直接作为准据法渊源适用。这就在客观上要求裁判机构在具体司法实践中能够妥善处理此示范法文件与国家制定法之间的关系。研究认为,《国际商事合同通则》作为裁判说理和法律续造的有效参考工具,不但能够强化国际商事裁判的合理性,还能实现对国际商事裁判的可预测性价值。
Although the Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contract(UPICC)formulated by the Roman Institute for the Unification of Private Law features a model law document with the nature of restatement of law,it does not have direct legal binding force.Therefore,it is not appropriate to directly apply it as the source of applicable law in the absence of an express choice by the involved parties.This requires the referee institutions to properly handle the relationship between the model law document and the national law in the specific judicial practice.The study holds that the UPICC,as an effective reference tool for judgment reasoning and legal renewal,can not only strengthen the rationality of international commercial judgment,but also realize the predictability value of international commercial judgment.
作者
宋阳
SONG Yang(The Belt and Road Development Research Institute,Yili Normal University,Yining 835000,China)
出处
《青岛科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2023年第4期50-60,共11页
Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金
国家社科基金项目(16BFX195)。
关键词
《国际商事合同通则》
法律重述
法律续造
准据法适用
Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contract
restatement of law
legal renewal
applicability of applicable law
