期刊文献+

“变”与“不变”的辩证统一:“两个务必”到“三个务必”的逻辑关系论析

Dialectical Unity of"Change"and"Unchange":Analysis of the Logical Relationship between"Two Musts"and"Three Musts"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从“两个务必”的话语论断到“三个务必”的经典论断,二者既一脉相承,又与时俱进,体现了马克思主义唯物辩证法“变”与“不变”的统一。从“两个务必”到“三个务必”的“变”,是依据我们党执政所处时代、执政面临形势、执政回答“考题”等不同问题的创新性发展;“不变”的是二者都始终遵循马克思主义实践理论、始终坚持人民立场不动摇、更好地保持中国共产党特有的政治本色。全面把握“两个务必”与“三个务必”及其内在联系和辩证关系,对于我们党进一步坚定历史自信、发扬历史主动精神、推进新时代党的建设新的伟大工程具有重要的现实意义。 From the discourse judgment of"Two Musts"to the classical judgment of"Three Musts",both are consistent and advancing with the times,reflecting the unity of"change"and"unchange"of Marxist materialistic dialectics.The"change"from"Two Musts"to"Three Musts"is an innovative development based on the different issues such as the era in which our Party is in power,the situation it faces in power,and the"examination questions"it answers in power;The"unchanged"is that both of them have always followed the Marxist practical theory,always adhered to the position of the people,and better maintain the unique political nature of the CPC.Comprehensively grasping the"Two Musts"and the"Three Musts"and their own internal connection and dialectical relationship is of great realistic significance for our Party to further strengthen its historical self-confidence,carry forward the spirit of historical initiative,and promote"Great Project Construction in the New Era"of the construction of Party.
作者 王海 WANG Hai(College of Marxism,Hebei University,Baoding 071002,China)
出处 《河北科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2023年第4期1-7,共7页 Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences
基金 国家社科基金高校思想政治理论课研究专项(21VSZ022)。
关键词 “两个务必” “三个务必” 辩证统一 "Two Musts" "Three Musts" dialectical unity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

共引文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部