摘要
目的评价不同方式的健康教育干预效果,探讨高校结核病防治策略。方法2021年整群抽样选取甘肃医学院在校学生810人,随机分为对照组、干预1组、干预2组,对照组无健康教育干预,干预1组和干预2组分别采用宣传手册和微信公众号进行健康教育干预,干预期6个月,干预前和干预后采用相同问卷进行调查。结果干预前后比较,干预1组核心信息2(χ^(2)=35.261)、核心信息3(χ^(2)=269.548)、核心信息5(χ^(2)=145.157)知晓率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),干预2组的核心信息1(χ^(2)=12.280)、核心信息2(χ^(2)=40.654)、核心信息3(χ^(2)=307.420)、核心信息5(χ^(2)=185.106)知晓率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);干预后组间比较,干预1组与对照组间核心信息2(χ^(2)=34.304)、核心信息3(χ^(2)=268.806)、核心信息5(χ^(2)=149.486)知晓率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),干预2组与对照组间核心信息1(χ^(2)=12.749)、核心信息2(χ^(2)=39.546)、核心信息3(χ^(2)=303.650)、核心信息4(χ^(2)=15.364)、核心信息5(χ^(2)=181.472)知晓率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。干预前后干预1组和干预2组健康教育意愿问题2、3、4的学生构成比差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论采用宣传手册和微信公众号进行结核病防治健康教育干预均可有效提升医学生结核病防治知识水平,提高医学生结核病核心知识知晓率,端正医学生结核病防治认知态度。
Objective To evaluate the effect of health education intervention with different modes and explore the strategy of tuberculosis prevention and treatment in colleges and universities.Methods Totally 810 students in Gansu Medical College were selected with cluster sampling method and randomly divided into control group in 2021,intervention group 1,intervention group 2.There was no intervention of health education carried out in the control group.Intervention group 1 and Intervention group 2 used the manual and wechat public account to carry out health education intervention respectively.The intervention period was 6 months.The survey was carried out before and after the intervention with same questionnaire.Results There were statistical differences(P<0.01)among the awareness rates of core information 2(χ^(2)=35.261),core information 3(χ^(2)=269.548),and core information 5(χ^(2)=145.157)in intervention group 1,and among the awareness rates of core information 1(χ^(2)=12.280),core information 2(χ^(2)=40.654),core information 3(χ^(2)=307.420),and core information 5(χ^(2)=185.106)in the intervention group 2 before and after the intervention.The difference were statistically significant(P<0.01)among the awareness rates of core information 2(χ^(2)=34.304),core information 3(χ^(2)=268.806),and core information 5(χ^(2)=149.486)between the intervention group 1 and control group,and among the awareness rates of core information 1(χ^(2)=12.749),core information 2(χ^(2)=39.546),core information 3(χ^(2)=303.650),core information 4(χ^(2)=15.364)and core information 5(χ^(2)=181.472)between intervention group 2 and control group.There were statistical differences(P<0.01)in the proportions of the question 2,3 and 4 of health education willingness before and after the intervention in the intervention group 1 and the intervention group 2.Conclusions The prevention and treatment level of tuberculosis could be effectively improved by the intervention of tuberculosis health education,the awareness rate of the core informa
作者
路彬
赵骞
霍红
康姮
刘一亚
杨佳玮
王馨茹
LU Bin;ZHAO Qian;HUO Hong;KANG Heng;LIU Yi-ya;YANG Jia-wei;WANG Xin-ru(Gansu Medical College,Gansu 744000,China)
出处
《疾病预防控制通报》
2023年第5期32-35,共4页
Bulletin of Disease Control & Prevention(China)
基金
甘肃省学校体育卫生与健康教育美育国防教育研究项目(2017B-093)
甘肃医学院预防医学一流课程(甘医院办发[2021]10号)。
关键词
结核病防治
健康教育干预
效果评价
Tuberculosis prevention and control
Health education intervention
Evaluation of effect
