摘要
1940年公孙嬿在《国民杂志》与《中国文艺》发表了大胆描写肉欲的小说,引起了广泛的关注,于是1942年围绕“色情文学”的意义与价值问题,北平文坛展开了关于“色情文学”的讨论。批评者认为“色情文学”表现人性道德的腐化堕落,萎靡读众的精神;支持者则以文本的创作方法与思想感情为基点,认可“色情文学”的文学价值。就文学启蒙立场而言,争论双方都秉持着“复兴华北文艺”“重振文坛”的共同趋求,以“中国文学”为中心积极探索文学建设的理路,由此展现了北平文人深沉的民族情怀。
In 1940,Gong Sunyan published some stories of boldly describing carnal desire in National Magazine and Chinese Literature and Art,which attracted extensive attention.Therefore,in 1942,the discussion of the significance and value of“pornography”happened in Peiping.Its critics believed that“pornographic literature”showed the corruption of humanity and took the negative influence to readers.But its supporters recognized the literary value of“pornographic literature”based on the creation methods and feelings of the stories.As far as the position of literary enlightenment,both sides of the debate adhere to the common trend of“rejuvenating the literature and art in North China”and“revitalizing the literary world”.They explored actively the path of literary construction centering on Chinese literature,showing the deep national feelings of Peiping literati.
作者
高姝妮
GAO Shuni(School of Literature,Shenyang Normal University,Shenyang 110034,China)
出处
《湖州师范学院学报》
2023年第9期81-87,109,共8页
Journal of Huzhou University
基金
2020年辽宁省社会科学规划项目“沦陷时期的北京文学期刊与北京文坛研究”(L20CZW003)。
关键词
公孙嬿
“色情文学”论争
北平文坛
文学自救
Gong Sunyan
the debate of pornography
Peiping literati
Literary self-help
