摘要
1995年至今,中国女性主义法学已实现从兴起到发展的迈进。然而,或出于引介带来的比对偏差,或基于法律万能论和立法中心主义造成的认知局限,其间亦有诸多不足。为弥补之,一是要批判“法律的性别为男”的预设,跳出性别主义二元论框架,代之以性别平等视角下的女性法制处境考察及修补性身份重塑;二是打破法律万能论的基调,认识到法律局限的固有性,转而限缩原有的目标设定,并与其他社会控制力量一道促进中国女性解放;三是超越立法中心主义的视域局限,通过侧重实施来彰显法律在推进性别平等方面的生命力和权威性。以反思和重构助推发展只是阶段性任务,从长远看,所期待的不是中国女性主义法学得到何等的发展,而是其伴随女性法治处境的极大改善逐步走向消亡。
Since 1995,Chinese feminist jurisprudence has made progress from its rise to development.However,there are also many deficiencies,either due to the comparison bias brought by introduction,or the cognitive limitations caused by omnipotence of law and legislative centralism.In order to make up for this,the first is to criticize the premise that"the gender of law is male",jump out of the framework of genderist dualism,and replace it with a gender-based perspective to examine the legal situation of women and repair and reshape their identity.The second is to break the tone of the omnipotence of law,recognize the limitations of law,and instead work with other social control forces to promote the liberation of Chinese women.The third is to transcend the vision limitation of legislative centralism and highlight the vitality and authority of the law by focusing on implementation.Promoting development with reflection and reconstruction is only a phased goal,and in the long run,what is expected is not how much development of Chinese feminist jurisprudence will be,but the gradual demise with the improvement of women's situation.
作者
李勇
LI Yong(School of Law,Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,China)
出处
《安徽师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2023年第6期102-113,共12页
Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目“当代国外马克思主义法学最新动向和趋势研究”(21BFX025)。
关键词
女性主义法学
法律性别
法律万能论
立法中心主义
feminist jurisprudence
the gender of law
omnipotence of law
legislative centralism
