摘要
日本学者久留间鲛造提出在研究价值形式论时需要区分两种问题意识——价值表现与商品交换,认为:价值形式论的研究课题应该限定在对价值表现结构的阐释上,交换关系的问题属于和价值表现问题所不同的问题域,不能混淆在对价值表现问题的阐释上。我们通过对两个问题意识的清晰区分,能够洞见《资本论》分别基于“相对价值形式”和“等价形式”对价值形式进行论述时存在的视角改变。不过,由于在“等价形式”的部分中马克思强调了等价形式一侧的商品拥有的“能够直接交换”的地位,这为阐述商品的社会关系中发生的“物化”现象提供了基础,因此,交换关系所具有的寻求交换的单向性关系带来的价值形式两侧商品的不对称性,其实也构成价值形式论作为一种批判理论所需要具备的问题意识。
Academics of Marxism in Japan had a vigorous argument about commodity value,and Kuruma Samezo,the representative of one side of this argument,differentiated two research questions in the theory of value form,in order to refute Uno Kozo's standpoint that exchange should be considered in the theory of value form.From Kuruma's viewpoint,exchange belongs to a different research question from value expression,and we should limit the research topic to the explanation of the structure of value expression in the theory of value form.Kuruma's differentiation is helpful for us to understand Marx's different discussions in Das-Capital about relative form of value and equivalent form of value.However,when it comes to equivalent form of value,commodity presents as the thing which is directly exchangeable.Based on this structure of exchange,Marx explained the phenomenon of Verdinglichung in the social form of capitalism.In consequence,the structure of exchange also belongs to the research question of the theory of value form as a social critical theory,which is neglected in Kuruma's theory of value form.
出处
《马克思主义哲学研究》
2023年第1期169-178,共10页
Marxist Philosophical Research
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目“德国‘新马克思阅读’运动的理论与思想史效应研究”(项目编号:19CZX005)
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(项目编号:012414370107)。
关键词
价值形式
交换
《资本论》
物化
Form of Value
Exchange
Das-Capital
Verdinglichung
