摘要
马克思之所以提出异化劳动理论,并不是出于一种人本主义的立场和要求,而是为了克服国民经济学在理论视野上的局限性。异化劳动理论的两个核心概念——“类本质”和“异化劳动”也都包含着人本主义哲学所无法容纳的内涵:“类本质”是人们在对象性活动中生成的历史性的本质,而并非任何先验的抽象本质;“异化劳动”的含义也不仅是马克思一开始对异化劳动的四项规定,这一概念还有作为私有财产的主体本质和表征社会关系异化的内涵。《1844年经济学哲学手稿》的主要思想倾向是对人本主义的疏离,是马克思于1845~1846年所完成的哲学革命的先声。
The reason why Marx proposed the theory of alienated labor is not out of a humanistic position and requirements,but to overcome the limitations of the theoretical vision of classical economics.The two core concepts of the theory of alienated labor-"human essence"and"alienated labor"-also contain the connotation that humanistic philosophy cannot accommodate:"human essence"is the historical essence generated by people in the objective activities,not any transcendental abstract essence;the meaning of"alienated labor"is not only Marx's four statements on alienated labor at the beginning,but also the connotation of the subject essence of private property and the alienation of social relations.The main ideological tendency contained in Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 is the alienation from humanism,which is the precursor of the philosophical revolution completed by Marx from 1845 to 1846.
出处
《马克思主义哲学研究》
2023年第1期149-156,共8页
Marxist Philosophical Research
关键词
《1844年经济学哲学手稿》
类本质
异化劳动
对象化
Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844
Human Essence
Alienated Labor
Objectification
